But is pryce creative?

Pryce IMO played his best rugby when longy was his scrumhalf and longy was our main creative player. Pryce is a runner, he's at his best taking the line on.

No. But before he went on long term sick leave he was very good at bossing us around the pitch and turning a game due to him being able to think. We don't have many players who can think.

I recorded the 96 challenge cup final on espn classics and you can see just how much better our backs was compared to the makeshift lot we have at the moment.

Prescott - massive threat with ball. Pace!
Arnold - only in for Hayes but good with ball.
Gibbs - powerhouse with ball awesome defence.
Newlove - pure class
Tommy - genius
Goulding - real scrumhalf. Creative, kicking game, directs the team and a leader.

Tommy got injured and Hammond went to 6 but even then we had bobbie giving us direction and tommy and Karl doing there thing.

Compare that to our makeshift backs now!

I agree he was doing ok but that's it, just ok.

Can't recall the last time Leon had good game against a good side.

Wigan at the DW. Granted, Jamie saved the day with his marvellous catch. But without Leon on the pitch we would have lost that match. He scored a wonderful solo try from the scrum for instance.

Cant argue with that but those were the days pre image rights and also the cap was either not in place or more easy to manover around.

Arnold was not a patch on our current wingers though. We cant live in the past though you are lucky to fit one top class centre in your side in the current game. i reckon we have two top sl centres. But world class dont play in SL. Its one thing to want more than you have but then you have to fit it into the cap and with whats available.

So just with the FB to keep it simple who would you get? Obviously tomkins but he is basically not available to saints ever. Who next well an NRL full back but the best are gonna stay on better money in the NRL. So no we are looking at federation based players. Personally I cant name a better FB that is a federation based player than wellens. So saying we need a FB with pace does not mean there is one ready.

I think ashe has pace and i think lance or lomax will take the role in 2013. if ashe does not prove up to it. At that point either gaskell will be what i hope he will be or wheeler will. Or we'll go shopping and either by a half back or a fullback.

Still think backs are poor.

You're assuming there, of course, that we don't have even greater potential coming through in the Academy. We could see some completely different players given their debuts next season, who knows?

Oh without doubt we will bring players in from our youth squad, it's cheaper!

It was a good watch wasn't it...

Yes, it was good side with options all over the pitch. On one side we had Gibbs who was pure power house and awesome in defence. On the other side we had the pure class of newlove with the pace of sully outside him.

Goulding with his direction, ball playing and top class short and long kicking game. Tommy at 6 popping up with his skillfull clever plays.

In them days we even had forwards that could attack in Apollo, KC, Karl Hammond, joint, Vila and pickavance.