No thanks, he has been quality, but his ego is bigger than his talent.

Very damaging player, but potentially hazardous to squad unity. It's a 50/50.

No thanks,other priorities.

I wouldn't say that. The main difference between our current side and the all conquering side of 2006 is that we no longer have Paul Anderson. Nobody could handle our front row that year and our backs thrived off it. If you stuck Willie Mason in our current pack we'd take a hell of a lot of stopping, but the problem is he seems to be the kind of person who stirs up trouble.

I agree that we have missed Baloo, especially when the going gets tough. The answer is not someone who would happily walk out on his club to persue other interests (one off boxing match i recall) that could leave him unavailiable for months

believe me he's not the player he was. He's all mouth and trousers these days.

The guy would demand too much money. If were going to spend big I'd rather It be spent on a fast outside back.
Besides as others have said he aint the force he once was.

I don't think his ego would take being overshadowed by a younger, better and gingerer player...

Complete Idiot.
No thanks

He's reputation as a human being is lower than a snake's belly.

Probably Wigan material.

I dont want him at saints,
but it would be good to have in in SL
Id love to see him get bashed by a few our SL heavies.

Also rather him not play for wigan to see a Barry mac/Fielden fued with him and fielden.
That used to ad so much spice to the games

Willie Mason isn't Mark Carroll. And I don't see too many SL 'heavies' putting him on his backside.

More likely he'd cut a swathe of destruction a mile wide through the competition.

That'd go down well with Fielden!

Hmmm interesting

No thanks

They guy is a ticking bomb, been in trouble in Aus a number of times due to poor behaviour.

I suspect he would disrupt team spirit too much.

Our priority next season is to bring in a top class centre, as its likely Gidley will retire.