I don't want to do the lad down he may be a good player and the time in the NRL may have done him good BUT..

He isn't the position we are short of we need a Daddy Prop!

In theory, we could almost play a second rower in every position 1-13 next season!

Have we not got 4 back rowers in the u18's that fancy a crack at the remaining 4 bench spots?

A bit like Chris Thorman & Keith Mason?

Is he better than Ashurst

To be fair, Keith's a decent prop. I wouldn't mind him back at Saints.

But it's took him a long time, when did he come back from Aus?

My concern is more the size of him, he is very small for his position. Hopefully he punches above his weight.

He could turn out to be a great signing, it's very hard to tell at the moment. I'd be a lot more confident if he was being picked over there every week, but he wouldn't be coming if that was the case.

Mark_Flash_Flan Mark Flanagan
Ive signed at St.Helens in the UK for nxt year, looking forward to finishin off the season with the Tigers then heading home to a great club

Taken from his twitter page.

2004 and he had a good season for Saints. I remeber thinking he should have got the Lance Todd against you guys. Had a bad time with injuries though in 2005 and found himself out of favour by the time Anderson took over. Had an unsuccessful loan period at cas, before (re)finding his feet at Hudds.

This signing has confused me. We need a prop and not a backrower. We are oozing backrowers. Unless the plan is to play TP at prop, this signing makes no sense at all.

This must almost seal TP at Prop. Unless we are buying without consulting the coach, about his plans for the team.

It could be a very strong 17, it just depends on how we go with having back rowers develop into props

Strange that Saints have signed another backrower but I rate him. Obviously very hardworking like people have said but he has a fair bit of skill about him as well.

Taken from BBC Sport

"can cover at hooker if need be"

End of Moore at Saints?

That may be decided next week.

Well, it IS July!

Not necessarily. But perhaps the end of Moore as a potential replacement hooker.