This.

I particularly liked this

scott moore‏@alecat21Reply
thanks for all the good messages and to all the haters can go suck a camel off #boring i ballsed up end of ✌✌✌

I just don't understand the twittersphere. Why put yourself on there for unlimited abuse.

The Daily Star is reporting that "sources claim Moore may have failed an in-house drugs test for a recreational substance"

rlhttps://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/245675/Vikings-boot-out-Scott-Moore/rl

Last night, Moore said on Twitter: “Got sacked. Sorry to all the Widnes supporters. Was nice while it lasted.

“Think I might change my career, become a lollipop man.”

Whilst we are talking about young lads, boys will be boys etc, they're getting paid very good money for playing rugby. A good portion of them, and I include Scott in this, are thick as mince. You'd think they'd realise they're onto a good thing and stay out of trouble.

He's pretty much got away with it each time though. I do agree though, I can't believe they risk taking recreational drugs when playing. They're finished at 35, take as much as you want then, just not whilst you may be banned for doing it.

WTF!!!!!!


Your a mod as well?

Whats going on at all?

They've got new mods?

Yes, two new mods and im disgusted I've not been offered the job. Even my beloved saintsfan didn't get one either!


Fix! Fix! Fix! Fix!

I've been here since dick docked and am continually passed over for promotion

I was brushing up on the AUP and some other interesting bits last night.

As far as I can see repeating the daily star link does not come under sub justice as

Under British law, a matter becomes sub judice - from the moment a charge is filed or hearing arranged and until a resolution is reached -

As far as I'm aware Scott has not beeen charged with anything or any hearing arranged. But I'll keep an eye on it as it may come under libelous if there is no case.

Linking a press release can't be libellous to the site regardless of the outcome.

At least in Russia they pretend to have a vote