I was convinced by the win. Lineham's try was valid and even if you think Peyroux scored you had no time left on the clock to mount a challenge. Saints were held to nil in the 2nd half.

Not if Peyroux's try was given, which sort of makes the point moot.

Sore winners rather than sore losers by most of the comments on here.


Saints fans are anonymous rather than kicking up a stink.

well said pal..this lot cant take it..nowt wrong with linehams try..peyroux or whatever he`s called looked like a try but some you win..sts try came off a forward looking pass and the pen that followed seconds before ht was by a cheat milking it..be interesting to see who stains fans will want to win thefinal or will they be watching another channel..what ever happened to the cunningham out shouts

Gidley 'try' debatable, Lineham knocked on, Peyroux scored. You were done by incompetent officials. Simple as that.

Also done by our failure to attack

This is bizarre - a thread started by a wire slagging Saints fans off for being sore losers.

On top of this most of the comments on the site are from Wires backing the OP up or well known Saints sympathisers from Hull, Leeds and Wigan agreeing that the officials got things wrong almost completely in Warrington's favour.

FWIW the issues are not about the tries but the unusual intervention of the video ref exclusively to the favour of wire.

Finally crap as Saints are offensively all the long range attacking came from us - the famed attacking machine scored from close in on the back of a helpful penalty.

Buy hey you won and I for one will be shouting for you on Saturday...... so jog off to your own board and enjoy it

I'll be supporting Wigan next week. I don't care what my fellow supporters think of that. Yes, they're our biggest rivals, but I feel safer walking to and from the DW and leaving my car around there. Can't say the same for Warrington.

Hopefully it'll be 62 years and waiting for a title for the 2nd most successful team in Cheshire.

It'll nearly be as bad as one major trophy in 80 years like Saints managed in the first 80 of your existence won't it?

And is there a random RL club from Macclesfield we've all forgotten about because Widnes have won 12 major trophies which is the same as Wire?

The fact so many of them are on this board justifying decisions & debating certain incidents tells you all you need to know. Speaks volumes.

Formed in 1873, first trophy in 1932. In our first 80 years we'd won 5 trophies.

And Widnes have won a World Club Challenge, unlike you lot.

When it comes to honours, as a club Warrington doesn't even compare with ours. We're a bigger, more successful club with a richer history than yours. 61 years is embarrassing but quite fitting for a club of your stature.

Now and again you hear fans from Leeds Utd, Sheffield Wednesday and Forest insisting they're still big clubs, but only in their minds. You can harp Saints fans as much as you like about your history, and the same as Widnes, but like it or not,over the past 6/7 years, the stats will point to us being the bigger club.
The perception of the size of a club changes over time eg 1954 when we had the 104000 attendance, I'd say we were the bigger club. From the start of the SL era up until 2006 you were undoubtedly the bigger club. But since 2009 onwards after we won the cc, the pendulum has swung. If your still the bigger club, ask yourself; why have we had more success (bar a jammy gf), why have the better players been attracted to our club and not yours eg Sandow v Peyroux, your average attendances have gradually fallen and ours have generally gone up over that period surpassing yours. Over the past 6/7 years, give me one reason why you believe your club to be bigger than us bar the jammy GF win?

(By the way, I do have a lot of respect for your SL era successes.)