You cannot be serious.

I am entirely serious. I've never seen a league winger so fat, slow and out of shape. No way was he onside.

It was an akward one to judge, seems as though Amor was caught in 2 minds. The tackle was not complete and it looked as though he wanted to make sure with a smother tackle.
I think he just got the technique wrong, he,s not that type of player to cause intentional injury.

It was careless, nothing more. Sin binning correct and a warning about the "technique" should suffice.

I agree, especially as hes not known for his foul play

Plenty of you saying it was a ridiculous decision. If a Wigan player had done it to a Saints player you'd be on the phone to the police

Dead right we would with Wanes objectives of tackle to injure, do Wigan still have those "rugby car crash pictures" in the corridor of the Orrell training ground!.
When I saw them a few seasons ago..........beyond the borderline of sport.

That's because it would have been intentional .

Police? Can't recall saints or lance Hohaia calling the police when Ben Flower assaulted Lance?

Didn't saints offers the support to the disgraceful Ben Flower?

Having watched the game back the yellow was deserved.

As for Saints getting all the decisions, the massive NFL block that took place the tackle before carney's first try was comical. It's as if ref's are now scared to give obstruction.

Interestingly enough sky didn't really make a lot of it compared with Phil Clarke's 'oh no!!!' with the forward pass call which was an understandable decision given that the player was stood in front of the guy passing the ball

Amor charged grade c
Burns charged grade b

Not sure how the RFL can charge Burns for that on Carney when they let Carney get away with a far worse tackle on Escare the last round (after banning Ah Van in R1)...yet again no consistency

Burns 1 match
Amor 2 matches

Imo