FORUMS > St. Helens > I'll bet anyone.... |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 899 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2019 | Feb 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Saddened! "The statement on the club website and in the MEN is a clear dig at Nathan Brown.
The capitalisation of the second 'THAT' is a very obvious criticism of something Brown has done or not done that has annoyed McManus.'"
Have you (or anyone else) got a link for this please mate? I have no idea what's been said...
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 899 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2019 | Feb 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Twentyman "Have you (or anyone else) got a link for this please mate? I have no idea what's been said...'"
Found it. My head's not firing on all cylinders tonight.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote: Twentyman "Have you (or anyone else) got a link for this please mate? I have no idea what's been said...'"
www.saintsrlfc.com/news/page/4002?
SAINTS Chairman, Eamonn McManus, wrote in the Manchester Evening News today:
I must admit that the recent defeats by Wigan and Leeds were as upsetting to me personally as anything I've experienced in the fourteen years of my very proud chairmanship of the Saints.
It was the manner and timing of our defeats that hurt so much. We just seemed to be out-enthused as much as outplayed. Prior to that we had played so well and fought hard in nine consecutive victories since the season started. But the Wigan and Leeds games were of much greater importance being against our bitter rivals and required our game to be raised further. We didn't do that which is why it is so difficult to deal with - but deal with it we absolutely must!
Although I am a lifelong Saints fan and rugby league nut, which is the only reason I'm involved in the sport, it is always essential that I carry out my role as Chairman in a dignified and professional manner. I am always conscious that I am a senior standard bearer of my club, my sport and my town. After very game I visit the dressing room briefly to shake the hand of every player in congratulation or in commiseration and likewise with the coaching staff. I never offer a view or opinion at that time as emotions are often running too high, or too low. And more importantly, I totally believe that THAT must be the job and the domain of the coach whose authority must be absolute at all times over players.
So, what I do is wait for a couple of days and then meet up over a coffee with our coach Nathan Brown and our CEO Mike Rush to have a clear- headed debrief in the cold light of day and to plan ahead. Although I must admit that this time my head is still not quite clear!
We now have a fabulous and plush new stadium at St. Helens as well as world class training facilities - a far cry from the very basic environment of Knowsley Road which produced generations of warrior athletes who have gone down in rugby league history. It was said of the British navy at the end of the Nineteenth century that iron men in wooden boats were replaced by wooden men in iron boats. It's my job to ensure that this doesn't now happen to us after the move from Knowsley Road to Langtree Park.
As disappointing as this very short period has been, I firmly believe we have the talent and the will to win the main prize of Super League - the Grand Final. We have to grind our way through the next five months and then raise our game to the required heights in the play offs. It is all about mindset and timing. The key to success now is that we learn all we can from these recent defeats and ensure that, when it really counts, we perform better and at a higher level.
A win against London Broncos tonight would be the first small step in that process and I'm sure that our fans will continue to get behind us in the brilliant way that they have all this season.
There was apparently more in the match day programme - along the lines of were being nice people playing nice rugby, when we should be ruthless winners
|
|
Quote: Twentyman "Have you (or anyone else) got a link for this please mate? I have no idea what's been said...'"
www.saintsrlfc.com/news/page/4002?
SAINTS Chairman, Eamonn McManus, wrote in the Manchester Evening News today:
I must admit that the recent defeats by Wigan and Leeds were as upsetting to me personally as anything I've experienced in the fourteen years of my very proud chairmanship of the Saints.
It was the manner and timing of our defeats that hurt so much. We just seemed to be out-enthused as much as outplayed. Prior to that we had played so well and fought hard in nine consecutive victories since the season started. But the Wigan and Leeds games were of much greater importance being against our bitter rivals and required our game to be raised further. We didn't do that which is why it is so difficult to deal with - but deal with it we absolutely must!
Although I am a lifelong Saints fan and rugby league nut, which is the only reason I'm involved in the sport, it is always essential that I carry out my role as Chairman in a dignified and professional manner. I am always conscious that I am a senior standard bearer of my club, my sport and my town. After very game I visit the dressing room briefly to shake the hand of every player in congratulation or in commiseration and likewise with the coaching staff. I never offer a view or opinion at that time as emotions are often running too high, or too low. And more importantly, I totally believe that THAT must be the job and the domain of the coach whose authority must be absolute at all times over players.
So, what I do is wait for a couple of days and then meet up over a coffee with our coach Nathan Brown and our CEO Mike Rush to have a clear- headed debrief in the cold light of day and to plan ahead. Although I must admit that this time my head is still not quite clear!
We now have a fabulous and plush new stadium at St. Helens as well as world class training facilities - a far cry from the very basic environment of Knowsley Road which produced generations of warrior athletes who have gone down in rugby league history. It was said of the British navy at the end of the Nineteenth century that iron men in wooden boats were replaced by wooden men in iron boats. It's my job to ensure that this doesn't now happen to us after the move from Knowsley Road to Langtree Park.
As disappointing as this very short period has been, I firmly believe we have the talent and the will to win the main prize of Super League - the Grand Final. We have to grind our way through the next five months and then raise our game to the required heights in the play offs. It is all about mindset and timing. The key to success now is that we learn all we can from these recent defeats and ensure that, when it really counts, we perform better and at a higher level.
A win against London Broncos tonight would be the first small step in that process and I'm sure that our fans will continue to get behind us in the brilliant way that they have all this season.
There was apparently more in the match day programme - along the lines of were being nice people playing nice rugby, when we should be ruthless winners
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 29214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Magic Superbeetle "You mean
I do.
"And more importantly, I totally believe that THAT must be the job and the domain of the coach whose authority must be absolute at all times over players."
Why else would it be capitalised? Capitalising it makes no sense at all if it's not in the context of the job of the coach. Although it's not possible to identify what exactly has gone on, it's clear McManus isn't happy with Brown. The way I read it Brown has either done something McManus doesn't see as his job and he's telling him to pack it in and start motivating the players or something he's not done, for example having sufficient authority in the post game moments and letting the players know what is expected.
If it was meant for someone else in the backroom, Cunningham for example, or a player he would capitalise COACH. Capitalising the THAT ties it specifically to the coach's undertaking of their role.
Unless of course the media manager has just ballsed it up and put a finger on the caps lock by mistake.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 899 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2019 | Feb 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Magic Superbeetle "www.saintsrlfc.com/news/page/4002?
SAINTS Chairman, Eamonn McManus, wrote in the Manchester Evening News today
Thank you
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Saddened! "I do.
"And more importantly, I totally believe that THAT must be the job and the domain of the coach whose authority must be absolute at all times over players."
Why else would it be capitalised? Capitalising it makes no sense at all if it's not in the context of the job of the coach. Although it's not possible to identify what exactly has gone on, it's clear McManus isn't happy with Brown. The way I read it Brown has either done something McManus doesn't see as his job and he's telling him to pack it in and start motivating the players or something he's not done, for example having sufficient authority in the post game moments and letting the players know what is expected.'"
My initial reading of it, I thought it was a shot at the players, and the recent rumours that some (cough Wilkin cough) were questioning tactics/ selection decisions - and McManus was reiterating who responsibility falls [isolely[/i to the coaching staff?
Or another shot at koukash, he can't help himself these days ...
Regardless of which interpretation is true (and I'm sure those who it was aimed at will know), McManus ain't happy with brown...
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 899 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2019 | Feb 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I think it's a pop at Brown...
Brown played down the derby against Wigan, highlighting that it was just 2 points. Yet you had Wane admitting that he was cheering us on against Cas has he wanted his Wigan team to be the one's who took out unbeaten run away.
As a Saints fan (and that's what McManus is), Brown's attitude above is not acceptable. You don't take the passion out of it, because that's were you get that extra 10% out of your team.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 162 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2012 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2016 | Sep 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Saddened! "I do.
"And more importantly, I totally believe that THAT must be the job and the domain of the coach whose authority must be absolute at all times over players."
Why else would it be capitalised? Capitalising it makes no sense at all if it's not in the context of the job of the coach. Although it's not possible to identify what exactly has gone on, it's clear McManus isn't happy with Brown. The way I read it Brown has either done something McManus doesn't see as his job and he's telling him to pack it in and start motivating the players or something he's not done, for example having sufficient authority in the post game moments and letting the players know what is expected.
If it was meant for someone else in the backroom, Cunningham for example, or a player he would capitalise COACH. Capitalising the THAT ties it specifically to the coach's undertaking of their role.
Unless of course the media manager has just ballsed it up and put a finger on the caps lock by mistake.'"
He is clearly having a pop at Koukash. It has nothing to do with Brown. The fact that he wrote it in the MANCHESTER evening news was a clue.
Read the whole paragraph. He talks about carrying out his role as Chairman in a dignified and professional manner. Something Koukash never does. He says he never offers a view or opinion straight after the game as emotions are often running too high, or too low. What does Koukash do? He goes straight onto twitter and rips into his players and coaches.
In the final sentence of the paragraph, he is refering to Koukash. It is well known that the good doctor interferes in the playing side of things far too much. You only have to watch Noble's interview on the BBC the day after he was sacked to know this.
Eamonn is saying that it is the coach that should speak to the players in the dressing room after the game. Not the chairman. It is directed straight at the doctor.
If you had been at the recent fans forum, you would know exactly what Eamonn thinks of Koukash. He properly ripped into him. It was hilarious. He still has not got over Koukash's comment about Saints holding back the game in this country.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1812 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2016 | Jun 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Just watched the highlights
Ok I agree something isn't quite right.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4096 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2018 | Nov 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Convincing win, unconvincing performance.
The defensive problems are still there and any decent side would have taken us apart last night. Ship the ball wide, you will score against Saints. Send up a bomb, you will score against Saints. It's not rocket science for any coach that has quality players to execute.
Our timing with the ball is completely out, we have no respect for possession and look completely and utterly without motivation. Maybe a rant off the chairman is what's needed because they are clearly not getting it from Brown, he seems to me like he wants to be their mate rather than their boss.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4411 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2024 | Apr 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Regarding the McManus piece and the upper-case 'THAT', I think he was emphasising what a chairman's role [iis not[/i rather than what a coach's role [iis[/i. However, given that Brown has been keen to suggest that we weren't far away in the games against Wigan and Leeds, I think the implicit message is that our coach needs to re-calbrate his sense of what is an acceptable level of performance for this squad.
Regarding the match, I've got mixed feelings about it. In many ways it was a typical top v bottom clash, with the intensity going out of the game after 20 minutes. We did dominate London physically, particularly in the first half, and our overall game management was good (keeping your opponents in their own half for 30 minutes is an achievement no matter who you are playing). It's worrying how poor we were in aspects of the game that require communication and organisation, though. Our attack was poor. Walsh was brilliant overall, but he does like to go wide a bit early for my liking. The ball keeps getting out to our centres and wingers with defenders right on top of them, because we're not doing enough work in the middle to lay the platform. Our edge defence is even worse, though; it seems at the moment you only need to string a couple of passes together against us and you're guaranteed numbers.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 5852 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The best action on that field last night was watching the girl's play at half time they made more yards than Mose?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 16963 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: The Chief "Convincing win, unconvincing performance.
The defensive problems are still there and any decent side would have taken us apart last night. Ship the ball wide, you will score against Saints. Send up a bomb, you will score against Saints. It's not rocket science for any coach that has quality players to execute.
Our timing with the ball is completely out, we have no respect for possession and look completely and utterly without motivation. Maybe a rant off the chairman is what's needed because they are clearly not getting it from Brown, he seems to me like he wants to be their mate rather than their boss.'"
I don't think I've seen a "supposedly" good team opened up so easy. Even when we was playing well early on I commented on how any team that moves the ball wide with runners will open us up with ease.
Up to the Wigan game, tho I don't think our defence was great, we had the motivation to get back as at the time we was "perfect" but soon as we lost that perfect record, we lost the desire to win at all cost.
When the perfect record went, we was dropping off tackles that we had been making, we wasn't running wirh the power and aggression pre Wigan.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: St pete "I don't think I've seen a "supposedly" good team opened up so easy. Even when we was playing well early on I commented on how any team that moves the ball wide with runners will open us up with ease.
Up to the Wigan game, tho I don't think our defence was great, we had the motivation to get back as at the time we was "perfect" but soon as we lost that perfect record, we lost the desire to win at all cost.
When the perfect record went, we was dropping off tackles that we had been making, we wasn't running wirh the power and aggression pre Wigan.'"
We've had 3 good defensive performances this year (Warrington, Salford and Leeds) the recurring theme is in all 3 we had a point to prove. (In browns eyes at least)
You can't nil a team and be bad at defence (Leeds for example I'm sure everyone will agree are very well drilled in defence and are yet to manage it), so we CAN do it, were just not, so the question is why? we all know defence is about attitude, and since Leeds, our attitude stinks. Has there been a fall out at the club (and McManus has decided to wade into?) or have our players believed there own press from the first 5 weeks and not bothered to train since? Whatever the reason, until the attitude returns our defence will remain leaky.
Thought it was interesting, londons first try was a carbon copy of the first try Warrington scored,
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 8991 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Ok so edge defense is a problem.
Why?????
We have 2 great wingers going forwards, are they to blame for our edge defense?
Is it the centres?
Is it the second rowers?
It's not always the last man in the line to blame.
Do we drop our wingers back too soon and too far. Sometimes they are dropping back on the 4th tackle.
Is this because Lomax can't cover the field for kicks?
I did notice against Leeds we did ok up to the 4th tackle. We could pin them down somewhat, but at the 4th and fifth tackle they would spread it wide and have the numbers on us.
|
|
|
|
|
|