No proof at all, apart from a camera angle showing him bite Slaters ear.

The screen grab on the link Mike supplied looks ominous to be honest.

Looked like a bite to me when i was watching it this morning,no proof apart from tv replays.Did you even watch it ? if so you must have a different interpretation of a bite than the rest of the world.

I watched it live at Saints and there was no evidence shown then that I saw of Jammer biting anyone. Until I hear the verdict then I am keeping an open mind. Should he be proven to have bitten Slater then he deserves whatever punishment he gets and he goes down in my opinion.

I watched it live from my settee and even before any replay I could see that there was something like a bite was going on. It looked bad on the replay and unless he can argue it was accidental he will be looking at a long ban. The red mist descended I'm afraid.

I watched it live to and there was evidence to sugest a bite,i saw it,the comentators saw it,every other person around saw it,how did you not ? Last person to get suspended for a bite got 8 weeks,i would expect similar for Jammer.

I didn't see it covered live and that was that. I saw the handbags but I didn't see any evidence of a bite. Maybe I blinked at that point or looked at my lovely bacon buttie!

But one thing I don't do is presume guilt. I didn't see it and I know that camera angles can deceive and even if they don't, something may have been accidental rather than deliberate. I don't know because I didn't see it.

So. As I said. If or until he is proven guilty of the offence I will keep an open mind.

Absolutely terrible, he should be kicked out of the NRL and return to Saints immediately.

rlhttps://mobile.news.com.au/sport/nrl/billy-slater-makes-bite-claim-against-bulldogs-forward-james-graham-in-nrl-grand-final/story-fndujljl-1226484854461rl

Make your mind up,one post says you did see it live then here you say you didnt,must of been a big blink,they showed it 2 or 3 times and some in slo mo,you said in an earlier post there is no proof,well there is,it doesnt look good.Fair enough keeping an open mind if you didnt see it,but its out there on youtube and other places,go and watch it then tell me there is no evidence.

Good job it wasn't Gareth Hock that did it hey?

Looks ominous. Saw it live and that was the first thing that went through my mind....then I saw replays and thought exactly the same. The only thing you can say really is it was a brain explosion in a massively pressured situation with tempers already escalating. It's certainly out if character for him and any comparisons to Hock and Bailey (who have a clear track record) is exaggerated.

What's Bailey's clear track record for biting or anything as grubby and untoward as that exactly? Could you supply evidence for your claim?

Bailey's never done anything that reprehensible on a rugby field.

Graham's in a for a lengthy, lengthy ban, a tarnished reputation, and a 6th losers medal to boot