Quote BackrowSaint="BackrowSaint"I didn't say they had no contribution, it is each and every plays responsibility to ensure the defensive line is set. However, you was saying it was mainly Lomax's role which is nonsense.'"
You said:
Quote BackrowSaintI have never come across a defence organised by the scrum half in the modern game.'"
You still haven't explained why Langer, Johns, Sandow, Hornby etc. are often described as (outstanding) organisers of the defence in the NRL. If your theory is true and the burden is shared equally then why is it these players are singled out with the label whilst centres, wingers, stand-offs are not.
Quote BackrowSaintIf anything the Full Back has a far greater responsibility than the scrum half so aim your suggestions at Paul Wellens, after all he's in the optimum position to see everything going on. '"
The fullback has an excellent view, but only in one plane of direction. Just like the fans stuck behind the sticks he has zero perception perpendicular to that plane. Which is why one player (usually the scrum half - but not always) must assume that role.
Quote BackrowSaintYes Lomax has a responsibility to ensure the line around him is set, but it's not his responsibility to set the entire line. Each individual player must be held accountable for being able to know where they need to be. The scrum half defends in wider channels than they used to, they physically can't organise the entire line, it's impossible doing that from the centre position.'"
Who said anything about organising the ENTIRE defence? I can't understand why you think it's impossible for a player to be anything other than responsible for [ihis part[/i of the defence or [iall[/i of it. There's nothing whatsoever in between.