Don't agree that it was the most soul destroying seasons we've had. We where battered with injuries in key positions and made two semi finals. Arguably we should have won one and got to Old Trafford.

Which trophy can we compete for after a "few months"? They don't come around until August.

The style of play on show has changed across the board in the whole of SL, not just at Saints. Something that you fail to mention. Strange that!!!

Your last sentence seems to indicate that SL is pretty even. So we must be in with a decent chance then. I will agree with you on that one.

It very much sounds as though you want us to be another Salford and risk all stability at the club with the procurement of a new coach and players that are not really available, I can't see anything wrong in a chairman showing faith and encouragement to a young british coach coming within a whisker of getting to both finals under so much disruptive circumstances.
Agree about our style of play, not soul destroying perhaps more of a frustrating one due to the lack of creativity at half back and full back, Fages and Owen will go some way to improve the situation.

I must be one of your "delusional ones", I expect us to win every game, win every cup, be the top side in super league, much sooner be "delusional" than be a "Cherry Picking Fan."

The injuries was nothing compared to what Brown had to go with. Brown didn't have any halves at all in his last year. Brown had learned his trade though and adapted our style and we win the grand final.

I'll ignore the sad one as usual. however I do agree with his ultimate point if not the mantra behind it.

I did not want KC as the coach this early on, but once he was picked you have to back him and give a rookie coach time.

2 years seems fair for him to show his influence on the team. I don't see the rush to sign him up. Coaches rarely get poached and unlike players it's a buyers market.

See how the season pans out and then offer a contract. If he had won SL or the CC in his first year you could argue that would be an exceptional achievement and so a new contract would have at least a reason behind it

Doing it now feels overly rushed to me.

Another convert. You'll be joining me for the post-mortem thread next Friday then?

How anyone can have a go at McManus for all he has done for this club is unbelievable?

The majority of Saints fans are quite happy with Kieron he got us to two semifinals last year with a decimated squad of injuries?

Yes his style of play at times is awful to watch and the Widnes game last Sunday was horrific and crowds will drop off with displays like that. But he needs to get us playing better rugby or he won't see out that new contract.

A very poor decision this early on and may cost us dear if we fail again and need to get shut.

Mcmanus has been the saviour of this club and no saints fan will ever doubt that but that doesn't mean people can't put opinion forward about him based on what he's done for the club. He's human and can still mate mistakes like the rest of us.

I think mcmanus is the best thing that happened to saints, without him we have no club but I also think he made a mistake 12 month ago giving KC the job.

I'll not against KC as he was one of the greatest this club had abd I also know him very very well but this job come to early for him.

The fact he's done well for the club in the past doesn't mean he's immune to criticism, if it is even criticism. Clubs do have different priorities and aims at times. Look at Arsenal in football, wildly successful from a stadium and finance perspective over the last 15 years, but their fans would give their right leg for a Premier League title. I'm a passionate fan that believes that without attempting to be successful there is no point existing in sport. McManus is a businessman and his priorities right now might be long term stability and not taking risks. Not wrong, just different, and rubbish 2.1943359375:5