FORUMS > St. Helens > So, come on then.... |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 16963 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
44308_1279480467.gif Mugwump mocking mental illness for a second time -
"You are mentally ill and I can't indulge your madness any more"
Utter disgusting abusive remark from a keyboard warrior:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_44308.gif |
|
| Quote: MickeyMo "First half we looked good. Turner was causing problems every time he got the ball and Manu looked to be the player we thought we'd signed. Lomax made a difference as did Roby (probably my MoM). Second half we had a different shape and didn't look as effective, plus we tried to force the pass in situations where we didn't need to. Jones took his try very well but Bradford's defence was very good much of the time. We should really have had more tries with the possession we had. Oh, and Meli was caught well out of position for their try from the cross-field kick.'"
I don't think Manu wasnt the player we thought we'd signed, he's not been used correctly. He's not a battle ram, he plays on the left edge and can be devastating if give good ball and in space. We never give him the ball he needs so he comes inside and drives like a prop.
Its no surprise he's had his best two games in a saints shirt the last two weeks when we've had O'Brian who knows how to play the halfback role. Manu was more effective today as lomax was next to him and the bulls was petrified of him which give him more room.
Use Manu correct and he will be massive for us!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7498 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2023 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
15174_1377541021.gif :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_15174.gif |
|
| Quote: Billinge_Lump "I think the moves at half time were to put Lomax at full back and to see if we could fit Wellens somewhere else, it was a good opportunity to given the dominance we had in the first half, he's already said that Lomax is his first choice full back.
I'm wondering when the realisation that Wellens plays at full back or nowhere is going to happen.'"
So basically tinkerman almost trashed our best performance in quite a long time because he is desperate to wedge Wello in somewhere. I simply cant believe a professional coach cant see Wello is done and dusted as a first choice player.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12738 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2024 | Aug 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
16.jpg :16.jpg |
|
| The most interesting thing for me was how Paul Wellens was used.
In the first half he was stood deep, but wasn't covering the central fullback position all the time, on occasion Makinson filled this spot with Wello being in effect a wingman.
In attack Lomax was named as standoff but actually linked into play as a fullback.
Second half Lomax went to fullback with Wello defending at centre, but attacking in the halves.
I thought it was during this period that we lost a bit of direction, also in part because Roby went off the field.
Manu was used out wide and was devastating.
Turner made a couple of breaks and looked really threatening on receipt of decent ball from the halves.
Josh Jones scored an excellent try, but I felt that if Percival had played, then a couple of the Manu breaks would have been turned into trys. Instead with Jones at centre it was a cast of him cutting infield or getting tackled.
A faster player would have scorched down the wing.
Walmsley was pretty quiet and took a knock. Jordan hand was pinged for two early penalties then quickly removed from proceedings.
Wilkin had a very good game. I think his time in the halves has developed his overall game. He is no halfback, but as a ball playing/running forward he looked very good. Put one brilliant kick in.
GOB again showed he has good passing hands, but most have dropped about 3/4 perfectly catchable passes.
Not in the same class as Lomax or Wheeler, or even an on form Gaskell.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 16963 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
44308_1279480467.gif Mugwump mocking mental illness for a second time -
"You are mentally ill and I can't indulge your madness any more"
Utter disgusting abusive remark from a keyboard warrior:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_44308.gif |
|
| Quote: Billinge_Lump "I think the moves at half time were to put Lomax at full back and to see if we could fit Wellens somewhere else, it was a good opportunity to given the dominance we had in the first half, he's already said that Lomax is his first choice full back.
I'm wondering when the realisation that Wellens plays at full back or nowhere is going to happen.'"
I think lomax should be first choice fullback BUT next year. The team will benefit more from jonny in the halves with o'brien. They are good combination as O'Brian is a ball plying half, while jonny is a runner. By putting wilkin at 13 give us the extra pivot with O'Brian which give lomax a free time and it WORKED.
The spine if the team today was the strongest we've had all year which showed in our much improved attack. Wello, lomax O'Brian roby wilkin is a solid spine.
The left edge of Manu and lomax was causing problems for the bulls all first half.
Brown swapped lomax and wello and we lost that balance IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6767 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Apr 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
Dwarfs, Gnomes, Halflings/GNOME2.JPG The new young dynasty of super saints is coming to a ground near you.
Welsby-Dodd-Simms-Eaves-Rizzelli, not Eastmond...the future is coming.:Dwarfs, Gnomes, Halflings/GNOME2.JPG |
|
| Thought we played very well first half lots of 2nd phase ball when attacking 25 metres out, bombed a few chances but sooner or later everything will stick, reckon we were worth another 2 scores by half time.
Can,t explain the second half lots of basic errors, players not knowing what they were doing with the player position change all this coinciding with Halibuts alien interpretation of the game which rewarded the Bulls with lots of possession.
Positives, Lomax and Roby and there contribution thats been missing, stand out player Wilkin had an enormous game in attack,defence and leadership. Jordan Hand was a bit disappointing with his discipline.
Overall we played for about 50mins of the 80mins and we won due to playing a team around our level at the moment. Looks promising if we can perform consistently like our 1st half.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 16963 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
44308_1279480467.gif Mugwump mocking mental illness for a second time -
"You are mentally ill and I can't indulge your madness any more"
Utter disgusting abusive remark from a keyboard warrior:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_44308.gif |
|
| Quote: The Chair Maker "The most interesting thing for me was how Paul Wellens was used.
In the first half he was stood deep, but wasn't covering the central fullback position all the time, on occasion Makinson filled this spot with Wello being in effect a wingman.
In attack Lomax was named as standoff but actually linked into play as a fullback.
Second half Lomax went to fullback with Wello defending at centre, but attacking in the halves.
I thought it was during this period that we lost a bit of direction, also in part because Roby went off the field.
Manu was used out wide and was devastating.
Turner made a couple of breaks and looked really threatening on receipt of decent ball from the halves.
Josh Jones scored an excellent try, but I felt that if Percival had played, then a couple of the Manu breaks would have been turned into trys. Instead with Jones at centre it was a cast of him cutting infield or getting tackled.
A faster player would have scorched down the wing.
Walmsley was pretty quiet and took a knock. Jordan hand was pinged for two early penalties then quickly removed from proceedings.
Wilkin had a very good game. I think his time in the halves has developed his overall game. He is no halfback, but as a ball playing/running forward he looked very good. Put one brilliant kick in.
GOB again showed he has good passing hands, but most have dropped about 3/4 perfectly catchable passes.
Not in the same class as Lomax or Wheeler, or even an on form Gaskell.'"
Just shows how better turner, Manu and jones looked with lomax and O'Brian in the halves and wilkin working as a extra pivot
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 14094 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2019 | Jul 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
2595.jpg I'm not Jesus Christ, I've come to accept that now.
[quote][b]XBrettKennyX wrote:[/b] Once more the anti SC brigade, purposely or otherwise fail to see the point.
Thick as pig swill.[/quote]:2595.jpg |
|
| Quote: St pete "I don't think Manu wasnt the player we thought we'd signed, he's not been used correctly. He's not a battle ram, he plays on the left edge and can be devastating if give good ball and in space. We never give him the ball he needs so he comes inside and drives like a prop.
Its no surprise he's had his best two games in a saints shirt the last two weeks when we've had O'Brian who knows how to play the halfback role. Manu was more effective today as lomax was next to him and the bulls was petrified of him which give him more room.
Use Manu correct and he will be massive for us!'"
I think he is the player we thought we'd signed, but we've had problems with runners all year. It was only the move of Lomax to full back that started to see space being opened up for other people, he then got injured with Roby and the problems started again (though less so with Makinson at fb rather than Wellens).
A full team, with Lomax at full back, Roby at hooker and pace out wide with the likes of Percival, Meli (who is still worries defences with ball in hand), Turner and Makinson will see more channels for players in the middle start to open up.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 16170 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2016 | Oct 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
40218_1286737075.jpg Success is not final; failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. (Winston Churchill):d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_40218.jpg |
|
| Quote: Judder Man "Can,t explain the second half lots of basic errors, players not knowing what they were doing with the player position change '"
You explained in the second clause of your sentence the reason for the problems you outlined in the first clause of your sentence.
Why the feck did Brown change things around at halftime? Can't he just leave well alone? He drives me mad.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 16963 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
44308_1279480467.gif Mugwump mocking mental illness for a second time -
"You are mentally ill and I can't indulge your madness any more"
Utter disgusting abusive remark from a keyboard warrior:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_44308.gif |
|
| Quote: Billinge_Lump "I think he is the player we thought we'd signed, but we've had problems with runners all year. It was only the move of Lomax to full back that started to see space being opened up for other people, he then got injured with Roby and the problems started again (though less so with Makinson at fb rather than Wellens).
A full team, with Lomax at full back, Roby at hooker and pace out wide with the likes of Percival, Meli (who is still worries defences with ball in hand), Turner and Makinson will see more channels for players in the middle start to open up.'"
I feel lomax and O'Brian are the pair to take us forward
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 14094 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2019 | Jul 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
2595.jpg I'm not Jesus Christ, I've come to accept that now.
[quote][b]XBrettKennyX wrote:[/b] Once more the anti SC brigade, purposely or otherwise fail to see the point.
Thick as pig swill.[/quote]:2595.jpg |
|
| Quote: St pete "I think lomax should be first choice fullback BUT next year. The team will benefit more from jonny in the halves with o'brien. They are good combination as O'Brian is a ball plying half, while jonny is a runner. By putting wilkin at 13 give us the extra pivot with O'Brian which give lomax a free time and it WORKED.
The spine if the team today was the strongest we've had all year which showed in our much improved attack. Wello, lomax O'Brian roby wilkin is a solid spine.
The left edge of Manu and lomax was causing problems for the bulls all first half.
Brown swapped lomax and wello and we lost that balance IMO.'"
He was stinking the place out at 7 at the beginning of the year though.
I agree the move of Wilkin to 13 is better for him and the team, I'd possibly bring Hohaia back to play alongside GOB to play the running role (which is his game really) or possibly one of the U20s? Our major issue is the end of the loan period though.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 14094 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2019 | Jul 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
2595.jpg I'm not Jesus Christ, I've come to accept that now.
[quote][b]XBrettKennyX wrote:[/b] Once more the anti SC brigade, purposely or otherwise fail to see the point.
Thick as pig swill.[/quote]:2595.jpg |
|
| Quote: St pete "I feel lomax and O'Brian are the pair to take us forward'"
That's fair enough
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 16963 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
44308_1279480467.gif Mugwump mocking mental illness for a second time -
"You are mentally ill and I can't indulge your madness any more"
Utter disgusting abusive remark from a keyboard warrior:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_44308.gif |
|
| Quote: Billinge_Lump "He was stinking the place out at 7 at the beginning of the year though.
I agree the move of Wilkin to 13 is better for him and the team, I'd possibly bring Hohaia back to play alongside GOB to play the running role (which is his game really) or possibly one of the U20s? Our major issue is the end of the loan period though.'"
He was stinking the place out but that was with hohaia and Gaskell with him in the halves. If we play O'Brian at #7 and wilkin at #13 it gives jonny a free role and not got the pressure of having to ball play like early in the year.
Doing it this way gives us two good halves which has been a big big problem. It allows wilkin to get back to playing a more complete game of actually running those lines he's famous for.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 29214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
6310_1310045241.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_6310.jpg |
|
| As already mentioned the first half performance with the ball was very good. We were far more adventurous and constantly looking to offload. We came up with some delightful moves and given the possession we had, we should have been 30+ up at half time. I wouldn't read too much into it as Bradford put absolutely no effort into the game and were just going through the motions.
The second half was a complete shambles really. When Roby went off everything completely collapsed and we looked farcical again. It was a real worry that with 15 or so to go, we were only 6 points ahead in a game we would have been leading by 50 or 60 had we shown more composure. Our goal line defense is appalling still, Bradford scored with pretty much every one of their rare spells in our 20.
Standouts are the usual suspects (Of late) really. I thought Willie Manu was the man of the match, he was superb. Sia put himself about and Roby was superb, back to his usual self. J-Lo looked bright and spritely, showing absolutely no sign of his injury. I have to also give a big nod to Jordan Turner, who had his best game for us. I've been critical of him, particularly his defense, but he was solid as a rock today and looked very dangerous today, making several half breaks. He seemed very motivated today, determined to prove himself. I'll take the credit for that.
What annoyed me was Paul Wellens playing. I would love to know what hold he's got over the club and why he can't be dropped. He pretended to play fullback in the first half but did absolutely nothing. He was then playing a mix of centre and half back in the second half and was anonymous there too. His stats at fullback will have been something like metres made 0, tackles 0, missed tackles 2. He didn't do much more in the halves either.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 2928 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2018 | Dec 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
12714.jpg :12714.jpg |
|
| Quote: SaintsFan "You explained in the second clause of your sentence the reason for the problems you outlined in the first clause of your sentence.
Why the feck did Brown change things around at halftime? Can't he just leave well alone? He drives me mad.
Most people have pretty well written us off as contenders this year, and there was a post earlier this week saying we should have an immediate clear out. Taken against that background, I would say brown is abdolutely right to try different combinations and find out what his best formation is. Lomax is still a bit if an enigma, he is best at full back, but the team did best with him in the halfs? This is the sort of thing brown needs to work out, so that next season we hit the ground running.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2681 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2017 | Jul 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
58216_1342011610.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_58216.jpg |
|
| I think the pleasing thing about today was how threatening we looked and that was a complete contrast to Monday night. That has to be down to Lomax's inclusion and although we all want him at FB, I thought he was equally as impressive from the position he was playing today, virtually a FB in the attacking sense. I'm happy with him playing that role for the remainder of the season as it gives a far better balance to the team IMO.
I thought Manu was exceptional yet again, as was Turner who was rightly moved back to centre. LMS is starting to make good yards too and that is good to see as he has been garbage so far. Obviously Roby was great too - unsure why he was taken off really and that seemed to change the flow of the match.
I also thought Meli was great today and looked very dangerous and his kick returns were a big part of why he impressed me. Compared, in that respect, and his overall wing play, to Gardner it is clear who we SHOULD be offering a contract to.
Negatives: I thought Soliola was quiet today, as was Walmsley. Those two have been impressive this season and probably our stand-outs, yet they looked ordinary today. Walmsley took that knock so in that respect it is understanable, but I'm not sure why Soliola was quiet? I also thought Jones was pretty average too and he bombed a lot of chances. I thought he was poor vs Hudds, I don't think he is a good enough centre.
The young lad Hand seemed to blow his chance really. Came on and gave away two stupid pens and they scored off the back of that. Wonder whether he'll be given another chance next week?
I'm unsure on GOB tbh. I think that he made too many unforced errors today and we should be expecting a lot better. I think if that was Ashe he would have been slaughtered on here (by me). But, at the same time he has shown a good passing game and can kick. I'm not sure whether I'd want to make a move for him permanently, I'm on the fence currently...I obviously do not want to write the lad off already but the more he plays the more he should settle into a role.
|
|
|
|
|
|