We were good today (a lot better than last week) and the defense was outstanding
Bradford were awful both in attack and defense.

Whose we Judas?

You lot were good, but we were also very poor. Our defence was absolute garbage, and our attack was worse imo, which was partly down to Saints excellent defence but also because we couldn't keep onto the ball at all. Saints didn't have to force many errors, we just made them ourselves. Pryce and Puletua were quality today though.

I dont think bradford are that bad of a team and i think they will start to play well when they start to gel as a team. Saints seem to be a more dangerous when they have lomax in the team as he has pace, i thought saints forwards took control today though, letting Pryce and Eastmond take control and play there own game

I hope so, but I'm worried that this excuse may be being used by McNamara for a few months .

Saints did look excellent in attack, with support everywhere, but It's hard to tell whether that was down to truly horrrendous defence from us or not.

Think we defended 6 sets of 6. And could have been another anniversary 38-0 again. From the radio our support play was great, well done Wello.

You can only play whats infront of you, and we were miles ahead of our opponents today. Clinical in attack and reliable in defense - can't ask any more than that.

Lets not get carried away, but like whats already been said, we have slagged Potter off all week and they pulled a very good performance out of the bag so credit were it is due.

However, it got me thinking is it a case of the players ignoring Potters boring game plan and playing there own game? Or Potters finally learning and listening to the fans or realising that his boring tactics don't work?

I always remember Anderson at the start of the second season. His first season in-charge was pretty boring and then in the second season we started throwing the ball around and playing some good stuff, and Anderson said he couldn't hold the lads back and they insisted on playing like that, so he told them to play how they always play. Maybe the lads have had a word with Potter? Who knows, lets just hope it continues.

Interestingly, when asked at Mike Bennett's forum last week, John Wilkin and Matt Gidley both agreed that under Potter they are freer to try the more 'off-the-cuff' stuff on the pitch and not necessarily stick to a very ridged and drawn-out gameplan etc, whereas under Anderson the opposite was very much the case especially when it came to the forward line and those of the backline who don't have as much of a creative influence.

i was at the game today and have to say that jonny lomax was outstanding, never put a foot wrong in attack or defence. its so nice to see a high ball go up to what would be ady gardners wing and it be plucked out of the air by a confident young lad who has all the skills in the world. great performance from all 17 by the way, oh, and lomax to stay on wing for me even when ady is fit again, sorry, but gardners not up to the job.

We were ok - Bradfut were complete gash. As for keeping Potter ? No Thanks.

Bleedin eck what more does he need to do?!!