I haven't got an allegation to make. It was a joke.



OK.

I think they banned the boring fart.

Never has a man with so much talent done so little.

Getting lost once can be unlucky
Going missing twice is careless at best

Making it 3 in a row shows Pryce hasn't got the bottle to stand up and be counted in big games.

What a loser.

Pryce is lucky we ain't got a top class stand off in the reserves or he might have been moved onto the wing in gardners place.

We can't put up with the way pryce has played at 6 this year.

He's more like a prop than a stand off.

Pryce would have struggled to get back into Queensbury's side on last night's performance. I wouldn't have paid him in washers.

It does make you wonder if Brian Noble was right about him all along.

some players just arent cut out for the big occasion

in cricketing terms , pryce is a flat track bully

I was extremely surprised at Pryce's lack of visibility last night, not to mention relieved.

When he's on form he's top class but when he's not he's very poor.

I'm not sure there's a place for players like that in any team? Waste of a valuable shirt space I think waiting for them to produce something stunning

Time for a change of club for Pryce imo.

Pryce is supposed to be our highest earner, and if that is true he isnt worth that money

price is a never has been a half never will be a half,
poor lad always goes missing in big games,
whos to blame the bloke picking him in the halfs, or price for thinking he is a half.

Pryce, along with Roby, has suffered from the slower ruck speed this season. If you look back at the great things Pryce does, he nearly always does them off the back of big go-forward and a quick play-the-ball, when he gets the chance to run at a retreating defence. These situations have been hard to come by this season (especially with our lack of prop-forwards).

Pryce is still a good player, and didn't have a bad game yesterday IMO, but he just isn't going to have the same devastating impact under the current interpretation of the rules.

Pryce amazes me! IMO he is such a gifted player, but only when things are going right and there is no pressure on him. I commented all game to my missus, asking when he was going to spark, but never did (though I didnt expect him too!). I would rather have a mediocre player who stands up to be counted when the going gets tough rather than a so called 'star' who only shines when everything is rosy on the field. I would comment about Long, Wilkin and Graham, but this thread is not about them. Hope you guys dont mind me coming on here and posting, and FWIW I thought that it was a great game, and the decisions didnt go for you on the night (we at Cas no all too well about Mr Bentham!!!!! p**k!)

Here's what I posted about Pryce on the Wigan board.

I've always thought that Pryce could be a very good loose forward. A Saints back three of Wilkin, Flannery and Pryce would be well balanced.
A runner (Pryce) a footballer (Wilkin) and a tackler (Flannery) has always been my ideal for the back row. (Not the players the balance)