You must be joking, there are many miles better attacking players in the NRL

that's why I wrote ONE of the best in the world.

Well, this is true.

I used to take this view, but I'm not sure it's true.

Some of the games where Pryce has been accused of "hiding" on here he has put in massive defensive stints, akin to Wilkin.

Admittedly he sometimes doesn't impress as much as we know he can with ball in hand, but he doesn't hide.

I agree. Pryce gets through a lot of tackles. He still looks the player most likely to make a break.

tbh I think when saints are in top gear pryce brings alot to the party. When they fail to get on top and dominate you don't notice him. Kyle seems more of a live wire who can create something against the grain whatever the conditions.

To be fair to our halfbacks it's pretty hard to create anything when our pack comes off 2nd best most weeks.

If any team kicks deep we struggle to get out of our half.

If I'm being honest it's the worst pack saints have had since super league started and will be worse off next year when gilmour goes.

Pryce is one of the most dangerous players in the league 10 to 15 meters out, 2 or 3 passes wide of the ruck!! When saints have plenty of ball in the oposition 20 pryce can be a match winner!! If saints arnt bullying teams pryce is ineffective and goes missing big time!! pryce for mine looks lost without an experienced 7

That's why I would play longy and eastmond at halfbacks and pryce at loose or even centre.

I have my doubts over if pryce and eastmond at halfback will work next year.

I have my doubts too. I think they are too similar.

When pryce and Kyle have been our halfbacks this year we have lacked direction and a good kicking game.

That could be down to Kyle being young kid just breaking in to team, our pack not being good enough or it just don't work.

It might all change next year when Kyle has full pre-season with 1st team.

Only time will tell.