His first stint was only 16 mins, every time he came back to the bench he looked unwell so the chest infection could be have been the reason. Every time he went back on the field of play though he didn't exactly shy away from any workload.

Peanuts? You can get an awful lot of peanuts for the money Fozzard is on.

He should just pack it all in,maybe become the new face of gillette like scully was..

Exactly mate. His stints on the field weren't exactly long, but he didn't shy away from anything, which showed great character and just why we signed him back from Hull KR.

An opinion I have, but haven't shared for a while, is that Fozzard is a specialist starting prop. People talk about speciality interchange props but Fozzard has always been far more effective playing at the beginning of a game. He is able to handle the rough stuff that happened in the opening quarter. If you bring him off the bench he has never been very effective, in fact he slows down play and gets in the way.

Foz should either start or not play at all.

I agree, we need to convince Mick Potter that.

agreed

I'd agree with that too - he isnt really an impact player and for me he is good at taking the sting out of the opposition.

Always has been. In 2006 when he was essentially 5th choice prop, he'd always started when included.

Has it been announced officially where Foz will be playing next year?

I would not mind him at Widnes for a season.

I was under the impression he was retiring - If he doesnt I'm sure he would do a good job if he dropped down a division

He said in the RL press a few weeks back that he would like another contract with Saints and that is what he is playing for this season.

I'd be pretty disappointed if he got one, a fair stop gap for this year, nothing more

I'd be disappointed too. He's not the Fozzard he once was, which I didn't think he would be when I first heard we were getting him back, and while he has been handy as a body on the park he hasn't really offered us much this season.