I would say it was a below average game or any code of rugby.

You mean like in the Four Nations?

Yes. However if our players dont wish to play for us anymore there's no point trying to force them to stay, and if they want to leave to play union I have no objections. I want them to show how successful our club is by producing players of that calibre e.g. Graham and Eastmond.

We don't need rugby union to showcase our talent. This four nations is of a quality that rugby union can only enviously look over the fence at.

I enjoyed the first half but the second half was boring as hell. One of the problems with union: the game can die at any point and it turned into a yawn fest.

Childish rancour. He has moved on get over it.

I am over it but thanks for your concern.

Kyle was young and naive and got caught up in it thru poor management on his side. They flashed the cash at him and he took it and from the what he got I don't blame him. It's his job and we all want the best pay.

He Defo handled his move wrong but yet again he was young and naive and looks to have grown up now.

Is James Graham a sell out? He went for the cash but he handled it better but to call Kyle a sell out is harsh

Pretty much this.
If he'd have come out and said I love Saints but its a short career and Bath have offered me gazillions, there'd be no animosity, but his management handled it terribly

I assume you're being sarcastic when you suggest Graham went for the money?! If you know the lad you'll know that really isn't the case.

I'm still in contact with him yes. He didn't go for the cash passé but let's just say he's very very well paid and earning more than he would here.

My point is - to the fan it's a game but to the player it's a job. If you was offered a £45k a year pay rise I'm pretty sure you'd take it ?

It's a job to the players in a short career and I don't blame any player going for better money but maybe Kyle should have had a little more class about it but I put that down to being young and naive.