reminds me of the same time last year when wigan were predicting a big win against us.
we turned them over with half our team missing.
don't think we will do it again but it would be great

Best time to predict when no one has a clue.

i agree, didnt think we would win first up at wigan last year with the team we had out but we did!!

hoping for a nice surprise again saturday

Saints 28 - 16 Huddersfield
Attendance: 14,568
MOM: Gaskell
1st Try scorer: Cudjoe
1st Saints Try Scorer: Perry (don't think he'd want another Naked Run after last time!)
1st Penalty Conceded: Perry

i seem to remember most of us were saying if we kept them to below 30 points it was seen as a good result

score: 26 - 12 (Saints)
MOM: Lomax
attendance: 14,145.6244098731213477297623

It might just be my foolish optimism, but I think we could easily put 40+ on them

With our squads, you would hope for a 20+ win
score Saints 38 - 6 Hudds
Mom Gaskell
First try Manu
attendance 12000

Sorry, but you missed an 0 off the end

is the 0.6244098731213477297623 a very short person then?

Surely the 0.6 is NS himself, who, because he believes the weekly rounds are irrelevant, will be paying attention with only 0.6... of his person?

If the friendly is anything to go by, then we should get a comfortable win. Their attack was very ineffectual and was not penetrative enough (that's what she said...) and we broke them down with relative ease. Friendlies are not indicative, usually, of a team's performance, though, and we should be wary in putting too much emphasis on what happened two weeks ago. Hudds have caught a few teams out in the past - as dragged up by the Hudds fans on here, i.e. Wigan.

Having said that though, we should win this game: it's at home, Nathan Brown's first competitive game and the players want to impress. Everything is pointing to a comfortable win. If it was at Hudds then I wouldn't be as confident, but I'd be surprised if we do not win comfortably:

Score: Saints 42-10
MoM: Lomax
Attendance: 13,500