When you are picking the top 1 there will always be a debate, but surely we can agree they are all quality

To be fair, Amor didn't do enough minutes last year because of injury. If he can get a season without much injury, then he'll be a big player in how 2015 turns out.

I don't think Amor is as good as Hill or Peacock yet, but given that he was a late bloomer I could imagine him being a genuinely top-line prop by the time he's 30.

I love Peacock but at his age there's no way I'd take him over Amor. Peacock is still for me, the best prop in the country, it's just his age that you have to take into account.

Hill is the next best in my view and Amor after that. A fit Amor is very high level. He was awesome for Saints prior to his injury last season. Your board didn't think he was good enough to even make your 17

Walmsley is top five as well. That starting front row of Amor, Roby and Walmsley is top class.

No he's 100% not as good as those two but up until his injury he was getting up to there level but IMO he was pretty average after he lay off but I don't think he was 100% fit.

Who is better than those two ?

Peacock just had a top class season. He IMO is still the best British prop playing in super league.

The guy is unreal!

Joe Burgess has signed for Sydney Roosters from 2016 onwards.

The selling club just keep on selling.

The sad thing is this isn't even selling, I wonder how the ego can cope with "the biggest name in rugby league" not being able to hold onto their own youngsters

Wigans plan of signing their youngsters on long contracts purely so they can get more cash for them has backfired as the kids have learnt to refuse the deal and they'll get more cash. Who can they sell to pay this year's rent?

They're hoping for another baby boom in Marsh Green so they can cash in on hosting Christenings in the South Stand.

I'm not sure what Wigan could have done here tbh.

He was on a low deal as a youngster so once he was so impressive, he was always going to attract interest. Either they've got to recognise talent better and make sure they're on decent contracts before they put them in the shop window or they run this kind of risk. Of course, the other side is if you put him on a decent deal and he's crap, then you're wasting your pennies.

He's really screwed Wigan over here though. They've produced him and developed him. He's given them two seasons before buggering off for nothing. He could have signed a short deal and allowed Wigan some kind of pay off for their work with him.

I'd be annoyed if I were Wigan, I'd shove him in the reserves all season and play Manfredi.

I actually thought he had another year left so you're right, not a lot more Wigan could have done really.

Ancient and disloyal.

I don't see why he owes Wigan anything. Development or not, he had a contract and fulfilled it? The alternate way of thinking is Wigan got a SL quality winger for a season for zilch on the cap. Any development costs are offset by a dramatic shortfall in salary (ask anyone on a graduate scheme!)

It'll be very interesting what Wigan do, I as a fan would want to see Manfredi put in, but there's no denying whose the more talented of the 2, and with it being so close next year is it worth the risk?

LOL @ THAT