I would second that haha

Hmm that's got quite a ring to it, I like it!

According to sky sports ticker, saints reserve coach Ian talbot has "taken charge" at Rochdale as part of vlub agreement.

All the details are [url=http://saintsrlfc.com/news/page/2378here.[/url

Like I said, Saints were insisting on their own coach at Rochdale.

I find that rather arrogant.

Not really, Rochdale are pretty turd. Their coaching may have an adverse effect on our players if it's not up to scratch.

Whats Ian Talbot done he coached kids not grown men and this could cause trouble between Rochdale players and our Rochdale should have there own coach they are there own club and not owned by us

I can't see many Saints players being happy with a regular commute up to Cumbria. This has all the signs of forcing young players to find another club or to leave the game.

Not at all. I would imagine the club will purchase a property to accomodate any players which choose to stay up in Cumbria. It is quite common in football for young players from other area's to stay in a house with a live in housekeeper to look after them and keep them out of trouble.

Do we think Rochdale fans are going to play 15 quid to watch a team with five saints lads in this could be different lads every week and they will be coach by a saints coach I can't see them getting many fans thro the gate

Exactly. Arrogance.

Mike Rush's coaching was pretty turd but would we like it if Rochdale Hornets sidelined him and appointed their own coach over our players? No. We wouldn't. (Well, actually, I wouldn't care a damn but I'd hate the principle of the thing)

It was perfectly possible for Rochdale to have Matt Calland as their head coach and for Talbot to be the youth coach, which is precisely what he is.

If I was a Rochdale fan, I'd want to watch a successful side. I wouldn't care if the coach wa talbot or calland so long as they won. Problem will come if talbot turns out to be a loser, do Rochdale sack him, or do saints? And who appoints his successor?