Ive watched Bradford many times on Sky and Newton as done nothing! Even Stevo doesent cream himself over Terry anymore. He is a spent force.

BTW im no Newton hater either, he was a very good player on his day but not anymore. Rather have Scott Moore anyday.

I agree over newton, and moore could help us keep roby as the impact player he is.

Newton

You lot are idiots.

Moore is outplaying him comfortably and is young and enthusiastic. Newton looks overweight and completely oblivious to whats going on around him.

So we're getting rid of Matt Gidley, KC and Sean Long and signing Terry effing Newton. You lot really do take le biscuit.

I'd still boo him even if he played for us. Scapegoatcity.

(It must be a wind up surely?)

surely our chairman wouldn't sign someone who cost us the league in 2005? Fair few quid missed out on there and i bet sir mac is still not happy about that

Biggest load of bult ever.
[size=150=redFACT[/size.

But not as well as Eastmond.
I can't see the point of having all three of KC, JR and TN on the squad.

there is absolutely no way on this earth that st helens r.l.f.c would ever entertain the idea of moving for terry newton(*spit*)




scott moore will do a far better job for a lot longer i.m.o

Sorry Ski but to suggest Saints would sign Newton instead of Moore is, well, nonsense.

Surprised you even bothered to post it.

I think its fair to say that if we sign Terry Newton, I wont be renewing my season ticket next year.

Having spoken to him a few times, he's actually a really nice bloke.

What's in the past is in the past. If we cared about the reputations earned by either current players or players that we've signed, we wouldn't be cheering on a few of our big stars. That said, he's got his best years behind him, and any move for a 31 year old, unless they're genuinely world class, is a big-a mistake-a to make-a.

Haha. Yeah, okay.

having spoken to him a few times, he is a complete c**t.