You have posted that on every board so far and it is B@ll@cks.

You cannot launch puerile, personal unsubstantiuated abuse at a referee.

You lost get over it.

even some of your own fans were embarrassed by Justines comments.

If you want coaches to abuse refs, and players and fans to treat them with contempt go and watch soccer

Yes it was a poor decision, a wrong decision. A bit of a bizarre decision. But it probably evened out with the first of the disallowed Bulls "Tries", where the decision seemed unusually harsh (even all the studio gang, bonehead included, expected it to be given) and you getting a try off a forward pass later. It happens...we've had more than our fair share of bad calls against you lot to write the book about it.

But surely if you were looking for laughable moments, that passage of play where you tried to keep the ball alive on the last and managed to retreat back over the half-way line takes some beating? Got to be up with Sherriffe's fiasco at Odsal last week for fiasco of the year so far?

so you scousers reckon the ref cost you the match, saints fans are unbelievable, week in week out you get the majority of the decisions, thats how its works with the big clubs, same in footy with utd n chelsea etc, to say the ref cost you last night is utter rabbit droppings, yeah it was a knock on but bulls had 2 dissalowed one of which was a try, saints, eeerggh makes me heave

Would you want any of them sitting on your jury?

Menzies knocked on as soon as the ball hit Meli's shoulder, it was a 100% correct decision and one of the easier calls on the night.

, yeah it did hit meli shoulder, but it wasnt clear who touched the ball first

the word "SAINTS" must taste foul in your mouth son, the crap you keep coming out of you gob just proves the deep inferiority complex that supporting the Wolves must generate lol:

Clear enough to me and the video ref with all the technology at his fingertips.

Video Ref had a great match. Correct with all the decisions. Only people who dont know the game of rugby league or those that are fu*king brain dead could of disagreed with any of them.

Menzies touched the ball and it hit Meli's shoulder - thats's a knock on. James Graham left go of Sams leg - thats play on.

Sounds as though your lack of success is distorting your impartiality.

I'd settle for Clarke and Carney; but if you saw Pinky and Perky there, the verdict would be down to blind chance and you'd poo your pants.

But its academic cos it wasn't given, and I've not heard one serious Bulls fan (myself included) arguing that any gross injustice was done. Maybe if it had made a difference to the end result things would have been different, and we'd have seen shades of the collective apoplexy that swept your own board a week or so ago.

Phil Clarke said on the Red Button part of the re-run that the decision was correct.

As long as you're wearing a red and white top at your trial you should be fine.

Back to these full time referees. One, two, three, four, four, fifth and last.

We could do with some full-time touchies too if the Salford match becomes the norm.

To be honest, having taken note of what those with superior knowledge of the rules explained, I rather think he has it right too. That's another week when a lot of people will have learnt a rule they were not previously aware of! And another week where you have to take your hat off to the video ref.

If anything Bradford were robbed by Silverwood and the Video Referee Ian Smith so shut up you moaning fools

If it was clear to the VR howcome he took so long with the decision?