Could be, but then again it could just be that I misread and thought you had quoted me. Pick either option, I don't mind which, but you must be some psychologist to figure all that out from one post.

Nobody knows how good anyone will be 100% until they have played a full season at super league. Then the is also 2nd season syndrome.

We had a kid called Sean Devine who had one good game against Cas and he was tipped to be the next Alex Murphy

That is true undoubtedly, but I just can't see anything other than Hampshire being a superstar. He's not just got one attribute that sets him out, he's got a quality all round game which is why I'm confident he'll be a very good player.

As a former mod, the warning is about the language, not about the point of view.

I have never understood people who feel the need to be combative about mods giving out warnings. It's simply a warning, ie showing where the line is. If people got straight bans they would then complain about not being warned first.

As for not quoting, just because you address someone else, it does not mean we can't all chip in.

Time will tell

The Wigan accountants will be happy. They might get 6 months rent paid when they sell him

Indeed.
Who have you got who would be of interest to RFU or NRL?
LMS?

Where does one start ?

Lomax, Swift, Walmsley and Roby have already been the subject of NRL interest.

Percival is the best young centre in the country and will soon enough receive interest.

Makinson one of the best wingers in the country.

Walsh voted 7th in the Dally M and tried to get out of the Saints deal because of NRL interest.

Burns an NRL 6.

Amor in the top couple of props in the country.

Luke Thompson is a star in the making who will be the subject of enormous interest. He may have already received offers, to be honest.

Masoe an NRL prop already.

Hohaia a World Cup winning RL player and regular NRL player.


Bit of a stupid question really but what exactly can one expect from these daft Wiganers ?

Probably most of them now they're champions.

So in your view is Amor better than Peacock or Hill?

I'd say yes.

Peacock is so far past his best it's unreal.

Hill is a good solid prop as is Amor but I think Amor has the edge. Only for injuries last season he would have played for England, possibly instead of Hill.

All opinions I suppose but there you go.

Peacock would still be #1 in the country if he only played 10-15 games a season. As we saw at the end of last year, it catches him up towards the business end.

Hill for me is the best in the country over the course of a season at the moment followed by Amor, Flower and Huby.

I thnk Hill's better than Amor (not by much), realistically, but he's a real class act.
Take away Peacock's name and reputation, nag, I reckon Amor's a better player.

Quote: Offside Monkey "I thnk Hill's better than Amor (not by much), realistically, but he's a real class act. Take away Peacock's name and reputation, nag, I reckon Amor's a better player.'" Disagree, Peacock is a freak www.superleague.co.uk/matchday/player/10352 www.superleague.co.uk/matchday/player/19

Quote: Offside Monkey "I thnk Hill's better than Amor (not by much), realistically, but he's a real class act. Take away Peacock's name and reputation, nag, I reckon Amor's a better player.'" Disagree, Peacock is a freak www.superleague.co.uk/matchday/player/10352 www.superleague.co.uk/matchday/player/19