but pryce doesn't like playing fullback does he?
wasnt that some part of the argument when he was with the bulls?

Don't think he liked playing wing for bulls.

Which meant he was being very nice indeed when he offered to play on the wing against the Quins to give Eastmond a go in the halves. He didn't look comfortable on the wing though, it has to be said.

*walks by whistling*

That would be a great move. Just look at how much Webb adds to Leeds' attack. Slater? Hunt?

Unfortunatly for you lot, its nailed on that the little Drinker from wakey will be heading your way next year.

If we actually signed Danny Brough he would be a stop gap.

Would he accept signing a 2 year deal in which he would be a bit part player, likely to find himself on the outside after a handful of games?

He would want to play every game, but Saints would want to bring through the kids.
Sorry this rumour doesnt wash. He is more likely to go to Wire who are in desperate need of a halfback with Briers being shipped out and Monaghan going back to Aus.

Re Pryce playing fullback. The Bulls and indeed GB have tried this in the past, and quite frankly Leon was appalling at it.
He has even played the odd game at Saints at fullback and been very poor.
His size is actually a hindrance as he struggles to deal with kicks along the ground, and he isnt the best leaper of a ball.

I have a sneaky feeling Saints may play Pryce on the wing against Hull, and play Eastmond in the halves with Long to give him game time.

Brough certainly fits Smith's profile of it all about being about the team, doesn't he. Before you type these things, take a breath.

Wellens best is obviously behind him as soon in the world cup. Be surprised if u throw in a youth player to lead you around the field next season though.

Indeed, his latest signing who stuck 2 fingers up at the team that put up with constant injuries to sod off to australia was really for the team wasnt he!!