It may have been while he caught the ball, but he was in the air so was not a legal tackle imo. However, you win some and lose some, their penalty for the 2nd King try could have gone our way 'cos Jammer was hit in the head with the elbow etc etc.

I thought that about Bridge. There were a few of them offside. But I'd say Riley was in the air, but it just equalled up the try we should have scored when Warrington failed to ground it over their own line and he ignored it.

Flannerys try should not have stood as riley was tackled in the air.

all water under the "bridge" now though.

Brilliant - the most one-eyed analysis of two tries one could wish to see.

never seen a Barrie Mc Dermot try analysis then?

Now that is sinking low, almost to Odemwingie standards.

referees biased towards big clubs shocker

Who are you inferring is the big club?

Sorry to pick you up on your grammar but I think the correct wording is "Should not of been gave".

tell me that was ironic, please tell me that was ironic!

Oh dear.

Just watched it again and I'm not so sure he was offside - he was just a lot quicker than his teammates out of the line. Bridge's speed coupled with Wilkin being so bloody slow preparing the kick gave the illusion Bridge had set off early.

Can't really say there was much wrong with it.

I can't believe you even have to ask. You should of knew. Couldn't have been more obviouser.

Just spotted this beaut on another thread...



Not much irony in that post.