Will Kyle be getting a trip to HQ about his tackle technique?

Not watched it back yet only got a glimpse on the big screen?

It was silly, but in no way deliberate. Should be sin bin sufficient imo.

Pretty ridiculous decision if ou ask me. Sure it's dangerous technique but it's so, so soft. There was no intent to harm him there, the ref should have had a word and played on. No way can they ban him for that after already sin binning him during the game.

There was an absolutely identical incident on Travis Burns in the second half that was absolutely ignored by the ref.

Talking of refereeing decisions, I'd like to see a replay of the Carney try from the kick. He's so fat and slow that there's no way he would have had time to move forwards 10m, plant his feet and wait for the ball to arrive if he was where he should have been when the kick went up.

Yet he checked the Percy try tho. I Thihk silverdud had another shocker.

I blame Silverwoods shocking white and gold kit

He always makes me nervous does Silverwood, seems to make things up at times. Glad he got an earful from the West Standers.
Seen a lot worse than the Amor tackle, Silverwood again cherry picking what penalties he needs to dish out.

Only seen the incident on the big screen and it looked soft to me. The burns one might find him missing a game.

Amor one was soft. You see worse going unpunished. But the sun-binning helped lift us and we won the game because of it!

There was nothing in the Burns one. He's going to tackle and the handoff takes him off balance and his arm comes up as a result. Absolutely no intention and id be surprised to see him get a ban.

I think he was trying to put him on his back, but got it all wrong. Deserved a sin bin.

It shouldn't, the hand off to the neck should make it penalty sufficient - only reason it might is because the Cas fans in the commentary team kicked up another fuss ...

Burns had his best game so far imo.

Will probably miss next week.

They ain't cas fans, they are ex wiganers. If it was Saints v a naughty boys invitational they would be the same.

It's a natural response from Wiganers to call it against Saints.

It was bad enough to warrant a yellow in my view. Maybe he didn't intend to push Tansey's head forward when he dumped his full weight on top of him, but that's what happened. There's not much more dangerous that having 16 stone pushing your neck into a place your body can't follow. Assuming it was careless, not deliberate (he could have been ignorant about which way Tansey's head was, and actually intended to just slam him down on his back, which would have been fine), he may get yellow-sufficient. But I couldn't argue with the card - if someone did that to a Saints player, I'd be calling for his sinbinning too.

I don't see Burns's high shot as particularly serious. He was pushed off balance by a very firm hand-off by Carney, and as a result his tackling arm rose and hit the head. Penalty was correct, but I didn't see any intent there at all, so I'd be surprised if that goes further.

I thought Burns was better in the two super league games before with some truly world class passing.

I've only seen his high shot on the big screen and I thought it looked pretty bad but like I said, I only seen it on big screen.

Happy with lazy Mose ?

I thought Mose was lazy last night. But if you look at the stats, you'll see that his performance is not very different from all the other forwards bar Roby and Walmsley. It just wasn't a great forward performance all round last night, and I don't think it would be fair or accurate to pick out Mose as a particular standout disappointment.