Simple would you have him instead of Potter?

We'd play an even more drab form of rugby. No thanks. I have found enough of a cure to my insomnia as it is.

Simple answer, no
longer version is he hasn't improved wigan in the last 3 years, and some of his signings have been questionable at best. On the flip side though, he has Leeds' number

dont think you can judge any coach that coaches Wigan sure its still the board that does that job

Until the play-offs arrive!!

Well if he didn't have control over signings as part of his contract, he's an idiot and so are his board, but i dont believe he had nothing to do with the signings, he had to have some input.

Six points adrift at the bottom of Super League to finishing sixth from top would traditionally be viewed as an improvement.

I thought that was 4 years ago?
2006
2007
2008
2009

4 years, or am i going a little senile?

No denying what he and uncle mo's calculator did in 2006 though

Couldnt afford him

he would cost less than most as there would be no compo to pay out

Aside from to Slick Mick

Presume slick would become assistant, so still no compo, clegg or foggy to pay out !

Saints aint wigan so i would welcome him to our club, must be better than potter who as failed when it's mattered.

You mean like Anderson in his first year?

Woah, Woah, Woah.

Have you not read the warnings that common sense is not welcome round here.

I am going to rename the site KneeJerkers.com