Lets be clear that first half most of the Saints have been woeful in that match.

But if that is an example of what level Owen's can play at Lomax has nothing to worry about in terms of getting back into the team.

Because he's a winger, yet again Saints panic buy a square peg for a round hole.

Like I said when we signed Owens, he's not a patch on a 50% lomax. I've nothing against Owens and he's a decent young lad but for me he's not a Saints standard player

Full Back is his position. Not that you'd know it from tonight.

Has owens always been that build? Looked overweight and unfit to me

Owens last week said with all the pre season training its the fittest he' ever been. We talk about Lomax but where is McD.

I'd release Owens. There is nothing there that we need. There must be a kid in the academy that could play to his level? I'd go as far as saying I'd play Paul Wellens over him, even now.

How far off fitness is McDonnell?

When you signed him it raised an eyebrow from me. Bottom 4 of superleague standard player at best. Would you not be better off playing Turner there until Lomax or Shannon are fit and either bring Burns back or play Wilkin at 6?

Neither was LMS on tonights showing.

LMS is definitely not a Saints standard centre. Unfortunately, the only guy who seems to think he's even remotely suited to playing centre happens to be the coach.

KC's selections are getting beyond bizarre. We needed a centre, a stand-off and a hooker. We had Turner (Centre), Burns & Fages (Stand-off) & Charnock (Hooker). We played our centre at stand-off, a second-row at centre, and hooker was split between a loose-forward and a stand-off.

I know players have to be adaptable, but that's not like pushing a loose forward into second row, or pushing a centre out to wing.

It's not really surprising that we struggled to do any attacking at all when we had people playing out of position all over the park. You train in a position, so you can perform well in attacking/defensive systems in that position during games.

I've generally kept my peace about KC to see how things developed, but I think his selections, and the consistent lack of any attacking threat or defensive ability on the edges, have become unsustainable.

The pre season training seemed to be built on muscle building with stamina from the vids.

However, fat lot of good that did us when we had no shape or speed.
I'm with the sad one on this tonight - KC is out of his depth.

I'd play Paul Atcheson over him ... Even now

Totally baffling and blinkered, KC wants to make Turner a no 6 at all costs at the expense of team balance and moral. I want Burns back in the side, he might not play well at times but at least he will show some fight in the back line, Turner back at centre he might make some defensive errors but at least we will have an attack out wide.

At the risk of sounding like a scratched record nothing's changed from last season in my mind and it was as clear as daylight to me then. KC is, was and always will be out of his depth as a head coach - most people now seem to be accepting it. I said it when he was appointed, and I'm not being a smart ***, but it will end in tears. The excuse makers will no doubt do just that for various aspects of last night's 'performance' but the truth is staring you in the face.

In the week he said 'we've prepared well and are ready but need to treat Salford with respect'. After the game he said' I sensed a little bit of complacency before the game'.

Which is it Keiron?

Great player. No coach.

Bang on