So we have no halfbacks, lomax gets injured and is replaced by a forward, likewise Percival, and Hohaia is still on the bench. What on earth is the thinking behind this? Seems as though some players faces just really don't fit

It baffles me. I just don't get it.

It's a joke.

Ridiculous

Not only have we had no backrows in the halves, we've had makinson go to fullback (swapped with wello now) and Lms in the centre and lance has played a those positions!

We only have two players left on the bench and players like Mose and walmsley who don't do long mins but lance sat in his bum. Surely we should have lance on and using the interchange to spell the big guys?

The selection of Wellens was a huge error. The performance in general has been simply woeful. We could be hammered here. Wakefield are shocking however, its a game we should have won by 30. We should be getting two precious points whilst the other top sides are starting slowly on the whole, but tonight isn't acceptable. We can't blame the injuries either,they happened way too early to impact the game, we have just been shocking. We could have ten repeat sets on Wakeys line and we wouldn't threaten it. Sick of setting rudderless rugby with no halfbacks.

It's a shambles, Cunningham needs to get his head out of his ar$e. Lance should have been on the field to replace Lomax never mind Percival. Giving Roby a rest doesnt really matter when your down to 14

Flanaghan and Wilkin in the halves , LMS at centre , Wellens at fullback and Hohaia still sat on the bench

If you aren't going to play him, why put him on the bench? Love KC but this is madness.

Stick a kid in and give him some experience, just a waste having LH on the bench and not using him

This is probably the worst I've ever seen Saints play. Utterly shocking.

So are we playing with no subs now then, basically?

Nah , but it isnt good.

It's very easy being a coach with a winning team, it's times like these we'll see how good Cunningham is.

Can someone explain why Lauitiiti isn't penalised when the point of contact is shoulder on eye socket yet Wilkin hits the shoulder and its a pen?

Cummings is clueless. It's a clear try because the Wakey player doesn't touch it. Had Smith touched it Turner is offside but he doesn't so it's a free ball that is touched by the Wakey fullback and its play on from when it bounced.