It doesn't mattter one bit if he stopped still or not,the rules say if a player is in the air you can't touch him unless you are competing for the ball. Washbrook has to either jump or move it's that simple.

He didn't lay a finger on him sarginson landed on him. He was competing for the ball by running to where it was going to land while looking up at thd ball and putting his arms out to catch it.

Are you doing this on purpose now ? i'm begining to think so.

Doing what? If you mean putting forward my point of view which you may or may not agree with and not just shutting up because you think I should, then yes.

I'm all for points of view and debate. But you just don't have an argument. It's as clear as day that Sarginson was in the air and the other player wasn't, there is no other result other than a penalty regardless of were he was looking or if he had his hands out trying to catch the ball. You can think it harsh,you can think it was competition for the ball,you can think anything you like. But as has been stated over and over if a player is in the air going for the ball then he can't be touched. Sarginson has every right to jump for the ball knowing that only another player jumping for the ball can touch him.

And my point is that I think it's wrong. This is a forum, people are allowed to express their opinion even if it's not the same as yours.