Obviously not on a public forum because that would be unfair on the players. But if there is any inside info from players i would love a pm

Be great if a player could say what he really thinks in an interview without it causing his place in the team which it would inevitably do

I got (gently) shot down for critisising Peyroux about a month back. The lad's honest and hard working but offers no strike whatsoever, and like Dawson just seems to be a stop gap. I thought people were harsh on Owens but he does look incredibly out of his depth. Tasi offers nothing.

The salary cap is restrictive however the standard of recruitment is poorer than the lads we're bringing through. Knowles looks excellent. Thompson when he plays offers tons more than Tasi and Richards. Like Roby, we're not using Savelio right. After retaining his services it just seems like he's been treated poorly.

I don't trust KC with recruitment anymore.

I think it was Sean Long who recommended Peyroux who is bit better in defence but not as good in attack as Turner. We should have made Owen a loan signing with a future contract if up to the mark. For me if Thompson can put on a bit more kilos he would replace Richards, also Knowles deserves a place in the 17 but he would have to replace Wilkin which won't happen.
Haven't got a clue whats going on with Savelio, is he a prop, second row or loose forward, Vea, LMS and Greenwood are keeping him out of the team but only just.

We,ve got loads of player "wastage" who are not up to the job, we definitely need a major cull next season.

Thompson should be ahead of Richards on the basis of his performances this season (his game vs Widnes this year was the most accomplished of any of our young forwards have had imo) but has had concussive issues and the club are rightly proceeding cautiously.

I have bee worried for a while Savelio is becoming more and more like LMS in not really having a position despite being physically up to it. Personally, I would give Savelio the rest of the year in the right second row spot, and leave Vea out. It is his preferred position, and whilst he may struggle defensively initially, if he can improve it, he can get back on track as one of the best young forwards in the game.

Don't disagree with a major cull, but its all about whose coming in to replace them. I had defended recruitment this year in faith KC knew what he was doing ... He doesn't.

For a number of years now saints have recruited very poorly and are now suffering the aftermath. There are other factors to be considered such as Roby and Wilkin no longer the players they once were. Also the halfbacks whoever they may have been have not really caused the opposition problems, even with Walsh showing some form and Fages showing promise they cannot perform behind a beaten pack as Sunday proved only too well. The team selection at times has been to say the least rather bizarre and this is solely down to Cunningham as is the lack of structure both in attack and defense. The backroom staff needs to be looked at as Hull looked twice as fit as the Saints. The defense coach should be sacked as the Saints tackling technique is abysmal and leaks soft tries almost every game.

Cunningham needs to show some guts and trust some of the younger players rather than using the likes of McDonnell, Dawson and Owen who are not super league standard and should have no place in any future plans. I cannot see anything coming out of this season so why not start blooding what should be the future Saints players.

Savelio played all his junior rugby at loose forward yet KC uses him as a prop which in my opinion will disenchant the lad and destroy his confidence. Wilkin's time has past and Savelio should be given his shirt for a continued run and let him (Sav) prove one way or the other that he will be part of the future Saints pack.

I agree.

On the topic of defence, I appreciate there's a technique to be learnt in terms of tackling & the resulting wrestle, and the organisation of the defence as a whole...but these lads would never have been given a pro contract if they could not carry out the very basic aspect of the game which is to tackle. So to me, it's an attitude issue rather than a technique issue. Daniel Anderson turned a Saints side who's philosophy at the time was 'if you score 30 then we'll score 40', to a side that took great pride in defending the line. He did this without showing half the team the exit and instead tweaked and honed what he already had.

This is obviously just an opinion and I accept that it could be wrong, but the weak tackling is a symptom of a lack of commitment. The reasons for that I just don't know. And looking at KC's interview on the St.Helens Star website, he doesn't know either.

Our weak tackling is probably the most easiest aspect of our game to fix and I find it unbelievable that they can't show some technique and effort and will to improve the situation. We all see it in almost every game over the last 3 seasons, our approach is a sliding defence which means in most cases we tackle the upper body first, the opposition can still drive to make metres and we lose control of the ruck, our players work very hard to try and stop momentum but we rarely tackle around the lower body and follow up with wrapping up the ball. If Sean Long is in charge of our defence then KC has to take a lot of responsilbity for this.

We only have 3 players who can tackle around the legs in Lomax, Swift and Roby, the majority of the rest are "tackle grabbers" who can't bend there backs, our emphasis on a sliding defence needs to be replaced with good line speed and tackle impact to control the ruck area. The last time I checked we are the worse team in super league for mis-tackles which means we have lots of minutes when we are not in control of the game.

I can't see any justification, reason or excuse for him to remain as head coach as things stand. It would have to take something extraordinary to turn this around.

I agree with the above that recruitment has not helped, but you can see he has lost the dressing room. Players who should be playing are being left out (e.g. Savelio/Thompson) and playing lads who don't deserve to play (Richards/Tasi). His press statements are an embarrassment and he unfairly blames the kids, shielding the senior players who are not performing.

Alex Walmsley is half the player now than he was last season and it would be interesting to hear what he has to say. I'm not suggesting anything by that, I just think he looks a frustrated player at the moment.

Another question is who would replace him and I have absolutely no idea who that could be.

The should be no place for Longy at the club either from what I heard few weeks back. He should be gone now!

I wondered how long it would take for him to self destruct. I haven't heard anything but I presume he's done something proper stupid? If it can't be said on here then I respect that.

This is the biggest problem, we can all huff and puff towards a KC departure but I can't think of any proven suitable coach who will have the strength of character to do do a major overhaul of the team(s) both on and off the field.
We are no longer a "top 4" team and McManus can't see the forest for all the dead wood hanging around, to improve our player quality is not going to be a quick fix.