They should have a 3 year cycle for the home shirt - Heritage/retro year , standard red vee year, progressive year.

I will be wearing my retro hooped shirt next season, just can't buy the new one which must be a strong candidate for one of the worst designs of all time.

Yup, didn't think last season's could be trumped, but this is a new low. ISC were a bit predictable, but give me a solid looking kit any day over these O'Neills.

It's how low the V is on the home shirt that spoils it. I actually don't mind the away one to much now.

I'll be buying neither

More to the point. Who is in charge of sponsors and why are saints sponsored by typhoo tea which logo in itself spoils any shirt design.

Are you suggesting they should reject the offer of sponsorship from from a major company because you don't think the logo goes with the kit?

That has to be the single most stupid thing posted on here in quite a while!!!!!!

I've been in saints shop todsy to buy a kids home shirt . He's 15 and the child sizes only go to 13 to 14 and look very small. The next size up is small man's which imo is a disgrace! The kids will be walking around looking like wearing tents.

14yr old to small man's is a massive jump. It's a disgrace.

Is there much size difference between aa 14 yr olds shirt and a small man's?

Putting it up to the other I'd have to say yes. You don't become a small man at 14.

To be fair to Saints, that is the same for most leisurewear manufacturers these days. They go from 13-14 to small mens and only some of them bridge the gap with XLB and XSM in between. One of our lads is in that gap now and most of the time he has little choice.