You mean apart from the title of your post?

Is he a waste of space whose legs have gone who shouldn't be near the team or is he a "scrapper" who the team can't do without.

For what its worth, my opinion is that when Walsh was out, he was pretty good, but we don't need them both in the team for attacking options now Wilkin is back. Perhaps we should play with an extra forward and have Wilko at SO?

I tend to agree with this. When Walsh was out, I thought he was doing a great job of pushing us around the pitch and looked like a very judicious organiser. When Walsh cam back, though, he then looked like he wondered what he was there for.

Quote: St pete "If possible, Id be tempted to try Burns as a 9 with robes next year if we could bring a 6 in'" Another piece in the MEN about Rangi Chase today. I'm assuming that we won't have the cash or the inclination to go for Chase, but it does also mention that Theo Fages's tribunal is happening next week. If he wins it, he will probably be a free agent. Could Fages be the dynamic running 6 we've been calling for? www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... i-10070734

Quote: St pete "If possible, Id be tempted to try Burns as a 9 with robes next year if we could bring a 6 in'" Another piece in the MEN about Rangi Chase today. I'm assuming that we won't have the cash or the inclination to go for Chase, but it does also mention that Theo Fages's tribunal is happening next week. If he wins it, he will probably be a free agent. Could Fages be the dynamic running 6 we've been calling for? www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... i-10070734

I'd rather have Fages than Gareth O Brien.

I don't have a lot to base that on, as I've not seen an awful lot of Fages, but GOB has mostly left me fairly underwhelmed over the years.

I would also rather give Fages a go over O'Brien.