I have a couple of concerns outwith the losses to Leeds.

1. I'd like to see the pack play with aggression again. It's no good being massive if you don't use that size. Saints have a pack of forwards capable of intimidating teams if we only use our aggression again, as we did towards the end of last year. Simply expecting our size to overcome teams isn't going to cut it.

2. I'd like to move away slightly from our defensive rugby of kicking early all the time. We have some very capable backs. Percival especially should be receiving far more ball than he does. Use our threequarters more and earlier in sets. Don't tell me that we aren't capable of starting quickly and blowing teams away in the same manner Leeds have done on us.

3. Offloading. We need to develop this. Our attack at times is all too one dimensional. Is it not common sense that big props, that we have in abundance, attract many defenders ? Is it not therefore common sense that getting the ball out either just prior to the collision or from the collision will allow us to attack space ?

4. Move Walsh in the defensive line. If he can't tackle, shove him to the wing. Wherever you put him, he cannot continue defending alongside Jordan Turner. Those two next to each other in defence is a recipe for disaster.


These improvements would make us a different proposition IMHO. However, the idea that we're done is nonsensical. Second in the table with only the league to play for. All out from here on in.

Agree with all that.

I don't disagree with you here. Although we mustn't lose sight of the fact that we are playing the COMPETITION. This is a very important point because Nathan Brown gave an absolute masterclass in how to get yourself into a position to win the title - without giving a great deal away. Compare Saints last eight games to all those which came before. There was a noticeable switch up in gears with the team suddenly rolling out tactics which were novel in the context of the entire season.



I'd like to see a more expansive game but I do think Cunningham's committed to this conservative approach for now. I really don't have a problem with kicking early - [iprovided we put the ball in the right place[/i. Down Zak Hardaker's throat is the perfect example of kicking to the wrong place. If we are going to kick it's either got to go over the tram lines or bisect the fullback and winger. If we are close to the line - force the opposition to escape from their in goal area. There's not a team in the competition which fancies three or four-dozen tackles fronting up against our pack on or near their try line.



I agree with you. Although I don't think all that much development is needed. Recall that at the beginning of the season Saints were tearing sides apart running one prop off the shoulder. The youngsters especially seemed very proficient with this tactic. Then, for reasons best known to the coaching staff, we suddenly stopped. Part of the problem with offloading is we have no one really who is capable of exploiting broken field situations. Walsh can barely put one foot in front of the other at the moment and Burns isn't quick either. The only other candidate is Roby - but he's already running close to maximum effort doing what he's doing.



As I've said - either Walsh is 100% fit or he isn't. If he isn't he shouldn't be in the side. Right now I doubt he's even close to 60% fit and he's a liability of nightmare proportions in defence. We have to be realistic and ruthlessly unsentimental. Everyone knows that Walsh firing on all cylinders is a class act. But right now we don't have that Luke Walsh. As things stand I'd switch Charnock to scrum half until Wilkin returns. Leave Walsh out of the side until he's fully capable of justifying his significant earnings.



I'm very happy with how the side has performed this season under incredibly difficult and challenging circumstances. And let's not forget this is a rookie coach who lacks anything like the experience those at the other top clubs possess.

Any side dumb enough to write us off as "no hopers" in the playoffs deserves everything it gets.

Offloading is a big thing for me. We're playing such conservative rugby but I'm not having that we don't have the personnel to exploit broken field positions. We've done it on a number of occasions this season and scored some great tries. Swift has gone full length a few times.

Reminds me a bit of 99 under Hanley. Only when Millward came along did we suddenly take off the shackles. The philosophy of the club is to chance your arm, offload, move the ball with fast hands...I hate that we've come away from that, however that's probably due to not having half backs for yonks.

Sure, Swifty is an excellent broken field runner. Unfortunately he's standing 40 meters away from our pack. If one of our props hits the tackle, spins and offloads we do not have anyone in the immediate vicinity who is capable of exploiting gaps in the defence. Yes, Roby could do the job. But you can't seriously expect Roby to do MORE than he's already doing?

I also don't have problem with kicking early providing we put good kicks in. We failed to put the ball in touch in that first 20 when leeds had a roll on which I couidnt beleive that walsh or KC couldn't see we needed to stop their momentum.

Also, you've got to ask why we are kicking early. Is it becsuse we can't make the meters up field like we was doing early in the year ?

The kicking thing gets me because we do it regardless of the opposition. It's either extreme arrogance or blind ignorance but we approach every single fixture with that same tactic - kick early, make teams come from their 20, defend them, control territory. It's fine against most but Leeds are just far too strong in the back 3 for it to work. Their attacking game means giving them so much ball is always likely to result in points as well.

I also think it shows a lack of confidence in our own attack. Why not attack Leeds ? Why not tell Leeds that we fancy our attack on you ?

It's difficult to fathom.

It certainly crazy tactic kicking down the throat of a back three like leeds have unless you find touch and if you don't there back three will burn you.


Tactically I don't think KC is up there yet. He might learn in time but this is the first time he's coached any time at all so it's to be expected.

Nathan Brown was very good tactically. The way he got us to adapt to all the injuries we had and change the way we played in short period of time was real top class coaching. What that guy did last year with the injuries we had was notning short of worldclass coaching. No halves avsilable to him and with flash and Wello our halves in the grand final it's a miracle we won.

Brown got a lot of stick on here but he was a good coach and the players loved his coaching. He built us back into a title winning team with his tactics and very smart recruitment and retention.

You won't hear a bad thing from me about Brown. I fully agree that he put the club back on course.

The manner in which he won us the league was built on aggression. He recognised following Wigan butchering us at home last year that we were far too passive. The result was an ultra aggressive defensive style that rattled teams, all teams, and we prospered from it. He also enforced the conservative rugby, through no fault of his own, as he had no other options following the loss of every pivot we had.

My worry is that Cunningham is maintaining the extreme conservatism regardless of us having pivots and also without the aggression. I posted all preseason that I felt we'd stroll the title again this year as with fit pivots and the aggressive style of forward play we have, I didn't see anybody living with us. However, we simply aren't following the remit Brown left us with. Teams have also found a way to play us, nobody takes us on without 5 props anymore for instance. Ultimately though, we should be doing better.

The player receiving the offload doesn't have to have the legs to go the full length of the field. He just has to take it up 10, 20 maybe 30 metres and by then he should have some support backing him up....and if not, well that's decent yardage forward.

Quinlan?
It appears that Leeds know how tro beat Saints. Conversly, we don't know how to counter their play.

In all the games leeds have dominated the tempo of the play and we've been fairly helpless because of it.

Our playing Roster kept us in touching distance perhaps, but there was a clear winner throughout imo.

We just need to figure out Leeds like they've figured out us.