I love our pack and seeing Amor back in for this one is a big plus; alongside Roby of course.

I think they still don't know what their best back line is so if we can get on top of Hill and Simms then we can try to put GOB and wheeler/Bridge under pressure. They lack a long kicking game so field position could be crucial.

I'm not sure whether I would move Makinson or Swift to FB as we lose a lot on the wing by playing Dawson. I'd stick with Wellens as there is no other option

This is the tricky thing. Makinson is so effective a finisher on the wing it would be a shame to lose that. I think you're right that Swift would be a better option as a long-term replacement for Lomax (if one were needed) - he'd be more of an elusive presence in the back division and we'd be losing less by moving him away from the wing than we would by shifting Tommy. The only thing is I reckon it would take him a while to grow into the postition, whereas Makinson could slot in tomorrow without a second thought.

Which is probably why Wellens will be fullback. Tommy maybe a better choice at fullback, but when you look at the options, its either.

1. Wellens, Makinson & SWift
2. Dawson, Makinson & Swift
3. Makinson, Dawson & Swift
4. Swift, Makinson & Dawson

Of all those line ups. Number 1 still looks the strongest

Saddend will NEVER agree to option 1

It's not really Wellens being a good option , more Dawson being bad

That doesn't mean it's not the right way to go.