FORUMS > St. Helens > 19 man squad v Warrington |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 16963 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
44308_1279480467.gif Mugwump mocking mental illness for a second time -
"You are mentally ill and I can't indulge your madness any more"
Utter disgusting abusive remark from a keyboard warrior:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_44308.gif |
|
| I'd go with
Makinson
Dawson
Turner
Jones
Swift
Burns
Wilkin
Walmsley
Robes
Amor
Vea
Greenwood
Lms
Mose
Richards
Thompson
sav/lance
I'm not sure if I'd go with lance on the bench for sav as we need cover for the backs if/when we get a injury. Also not sure how fit robes is.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4411 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2024 | Apr 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
4750_1435141111.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_4750.jpg |
|
| Quote: Offside Monkey "I'd like Makin to stay on the wing. I think he's perfecting his game there very well and is coming up with some great plays in defence to match his trademark finish. I'd like to say Swift would be a better bet at full back as he's a more dangerous runner (and generally safe under kicks) but he's just got that 1 (or 2) silly, random mistakes per game that hold him back.'"
This is the tricky thing. Makinson is so effective a finisher on the wing it would be a shame to lose that. I think you're right that Swift would be a better option as a long-term replacement for Lomax (if one were needed) - he'd be more of an elusive presence in the back division and we'd be losing less by moving him away from the wing than we would by shifting Tommy. The only thing is I reckon it would take him a while to grow into the postition, whereas Makinson could slot in tomorrow without a second thought.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 8991 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
47035_1386433761.gif We can be bold enough to make a stand and do battle for our views and beliefs. But we must strive to be mature enough not to resort to unnecessary personal attacks upon people with opposing views.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_47035.gif |
|
| Which is probably why Wellens will be fullback. Tommy maybe a better choice at fullback, but when you look at the options, its either.
1. Wellens, Makinson & SWift
2. Dawson, Makinson & Swift
3. Makinson, Dawson & Swift
4. Swift, Makinson & Dawson
Of all those line ups. Number 1 still looks the strongest
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6767 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Apr 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
Dwarfs, Gnomes, Halflings/GNOME2.JPG The new young dynasty of super saints is coming to a ground near you.
Welsby-Dodd-Simms-Eaves-Rizzelli, not Eastmond...the future is coming.:Dwarfs, Gnomes, Halflings/GNOME2.JPG |
|
| Quote: bewareshadows "Which is probably why Wellens will be fullback. Tommy maybe a better choice at fullback, but when you look at the options, its either.
1. Wellens, Makinson & SWift
2. Dawson, Makinson & Swift
3. Makinson, Dawson & Swift
4. Swift, Makinson & Dawson
Of all those line ups. Number 1 still looks the strongest'"
Saddend will NEVER agree to option 1
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 7498 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2023 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
15174_1377541021.gif :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_15174.gif |
|
| Quote: bewareshadows "Which is probably why Wellens will be fullback. Tommy maybe a better choice at fullback, but when you look at the options, its either.
1. Wellens, Makinson & SWift
2. Dawson, Makinson & Swift
3. Makinson, Dawson & Swift
4. Swift, Makinson & Dawson
Of all those line ups. Number 1 still looks the strongest'"
It's not really Wellens being a good option , more Dawson being bad
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1220 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2023 | Sep 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
52916_1378593744.jpg A pint of sweat, saves a gallon of blood. - George S. Patton
In war, resolution; in defeat, defiance; in victory, magnanimity. - Winston Churchill
It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it. - General Douglas MacArthur
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. - Isaac Asimov:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_52916.jpg |
|
| Quote: Judder Man "Saddend will NEVER agree to option 1'"
That doesn't mean it's not the right way to go.
|
|
|
|
|
|