Quote BackrowSaint="BackrowSaint"Swift can become a better running full back than both.
Tommy can become a better defensive full back than both.
Jonny can become a better organising and play making full back than both.
All have pros and cons but I think the more rounded and better across all areas is Lomax.'"
Lomax is my preferred option at fullback but with us having Burns, Walsh and Wilkin who can ball play, we we now require lomax to be a different fullback than he's been?
He's played as a 2nd or 3rd pivot this year as we've very rarely had Wilkin, Walsh or lance on the field at the same time.
I thought the fact he played as a pivot was crucial to our game but that may not be needed so be interesting how we will use him.