|
FORUMS > St. Helens > Lomax Out For The Season! |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 43 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2014 | 11 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2014 | Jun 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: St pete "I agree, the 13 role is just a extra prop and LMS isn't good enough In a beaten pack. He's all high fives and back patting when we put a big score on but nowhere to me seen when it matters.
Didn't rate him at London, he's had half a good season in his time here.'"
Total rubbish, the lad is in his 4th season at saints and was brought in as a fourth prop, however due to other props being injured, he has always played and done his best. As you say you don't rate him but that's your opinion. I do rate him and hope he produces good work for the rest of the season and continues with his high fives and back patting when we score , that's what we call appreciation for a player who scores. What do you want the players to do , nothing ?
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12738 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2024 | Aug 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
16.jpg :16.jpg |
|
| ive always been a big Clough fan.
However I will say that since he suffered a serious neck injury in I think 2011, he hasn't been quite the same.
I do recall that it was touch and go whether he would have to retire at one stage, and it does make you wonder how it has affected him physically as a player.
I still think he is a useful player to have around, one with a good attitude, hard working and consistent.
With regard to LMS I think he is suffering because he isn't really a front line prop. He isn't big enough.
We should play him either at 13 or in the second row, where he would add a bit of much needed size out wide.
I happen to think our packs big achilles heel is the second row, which is too lightweight. The better teams know if you muscle up against our front row, we don't have the option of moving the ball wide and using the backrowers to make the yards on the fringes. This by the way has the added advantage of stretching and tiring a defence, as they have to muscle up against the front row, then quickly slide wide to tackle big men running out wide. Then move back infield to tackle the props again.
Wire, Leeds, Castleford and Huddersfield all have backrowers in the 105kg+ bracket, ours are in the mid 90kg. That's giving away upto two stone in old money.
According to the official stats only Wigans backrow, is lighter than Saints of the top teams, however physically on the pitch O'loughlin, Farrell and Batemen look and play heavier. I suspect Wigan are under reporting their player size. As while Farrell for example isn't the biggest of backrowers I think there is no way he is lighter than Wilkin which is what the stats seem to show.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 3844 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
60223_1310112970.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_60223.jpg |
|
| Quote: Tryhard "I thought this thread was about Lomax not about other players. We all know that yellow G has nothing good to say about LMS and other players, but always digs at LMS. It's like your infatuated with the lad. I am not sure what games you are watching but I think he plays well, look at his stats against other saints players, remember he also missed a few games. Yes he has made mistakes but he is getting better with every game. I can't believe what I read on here sometimes, you are all supposed to be saints fans, yet day in day out players coaches back room staff are being slated. Now let's get back to the thread - Lomax being out will be devastating for him and saints, but we have depth in the squad and can come through this . We have done it in the past and can do it again. Best of luck Jonny'"
Here we go. Blinkered and naive is back with his do-gooding ramblings.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
27476.gif I am the hash browns of rlfans :27476.gif |
|
| Quote: The Chair Maker "ive always been a big Clough fan.
However I will say that since he suffered a serious neck injury in I think 2011, he hasn't been quite the same.
I do recall that it was touch and go whether he would have to retire at one stage, and it does make you wonder how it has affected him physically as a player.
I still think he is a useful player to have around, one with a good attitude, hard working and consistent.
With regard to LMS I think he is suffering because he isn't really a front line prop. He isn't big enough.
We should play him either at 13 or in the second row, where he would add a bit of much needed size out wide.
I happen to think our packs big achilles heel is the second row, which is too lightweight. The better teams know if you muscle up against our front row, we don't have the option of moving the ball wide and using the backrowers to make the yards on the fringes. This by the way has the added advantage of stretching and tiring a defence, as they have to muscle up against the front row, then quickly slide wide to tackle big men running out wide. Then move back infield to tackle the props again.
Wire, Leeds, Castleford and Huddersfield all have backrowers in the 105kg+ bracket, ours are in the mid 90kg. That's giving away upto two stone in old money.
According to the official stats only Wigans backrow, is lighter than Saints of the top teams, however physically on the pitch O'loughlin, Farrell and Batemen look and play heavier. I suspect Wigan are under reporting their player size. As while Farrell for example isn't the biggest of backrowers I think there is no way he is lighter than Wilkin which is what the stats seem to show.'"
Vea for soliola actually goes some way to addressing that problem (which I wholeheartedly agree with you on).
Hopefully with the kids coming through, and a bit more tinkering, lms can be 6/7 choice prop but played wider in the second row (that said even our wide running second rowers are being played more like battering rams at the moment (see soliola)) and Wilkin into lock will give more size and balance to the pack. Lms, Vea and manu as second row options with Wilkin at lock looks a lot bigger for our back row options then we currently have (if we lose Manu, well hopefully bring another in/ Savelio)
| | | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 9565 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2019 | Dec 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
fonds noir/Buzz Lightyear.gif :fonds noir/Buzz Lightyear.gif |
|
| On the original topic, always sad to see any player out for a long time with injury. Hope he makes a full recovery.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 16963 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
44308_1279480467.gif Mugwump mocking mental illness for a second time -
"You are mentally ill and I can't indulge your madness any more"
Utter disgusting abusive remark from a keyboard warrior:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_44308.gif |
|
| Quote: Tryhard "Total rubbish, the lad is in his 4th season at saints and was brought in as a fourth prop, however due to other props being injured, he has always played and done his best. As you say you don't rate him but that's your opinion. I do rate him and hope he produces good work for the rest of the season and continues with his high fives and back patting when we score , that's what we call appreciation for a player who scores. What do you want the players to do , nothing ?'"
Are we still talking about LMS?
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
4.2646484375:5
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | 19.65M | 1,915 | 80,155 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
|
Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wakefield |
27 |
1032 |
275 |
757 |
52 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Toulouse |
26 |
765 |
388 |
377 |
37 |
Bradford |
28 |
723 |
420 |
303 |
36 |
York |
29 |
695 |
501 |
194 |
32 |
Widnes |
27 |
561 |
502 |
59 |
29 |
Featherstone |
27 |
634 |
525 |
109 |
28 |
|
Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
Swinton |
28 |
484 |
676 |
-192 |
20 |
Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
Hunslet |
1 |
6 |
10 |
-4 |
0 |
|