Because he was put on report? You do know what the means don't you? Chance of a ban yeah?

and you seriously expected him to get charged for it? just because its on report doesn't mean you have been charged for it.

No, when did i say that? When did anyone say that? Saddened was just asking.

well he ask anything about o'loughlin? and clearly it was going to be penalty sufficient or what ever they call it these day. So my point stands why would there be anything.

Right OK guys remember not to ask about any disciplinary action if dubairl's thoughts oppose your own.

or put the brain in gear and use common sense that a player won't be punished for a nothing incident.

Give over. You can claim it was a nothing incident, but it was a bad one. The fact that he's fallen into it may mitigate it to some extent, but it was still reckless and it's not like he backed out one he realised it was the face he was impacting on. The subsequent chest banging and back slapping was worthy of a ban on its own.

Not saying whether O'Loughlin should have been banned or not, but when someone is knocked out, it isn't a nothing incident.

ok maybe the wrong phrase to use but it wasn't an of serious foul play, it was an accident in a contact sport. i think some still believe he hit him with the should/elbow (I thought that on the first replay but the 2nd shows its not)

But you basically mocked him for asking a question, don't be so arrogant.

Mocked?

i said why would you expect there to be punishment? because he plays for Wigan and he knocked a saints player out by accident?