Quote: Saddened! "You are wrong, stop taking everything on it's literal content, think a little.
It was a bad challenge, I mentioned at the time it was a 1-2 sort of offense, but he got off with it. I put that as O'Loughlin was very low himself when he put the challenge in, had Richards stood up, he would have missed him by a foot. But no drama. The reaction from you and the other Goon on here has been interesting, you seem utterly incredulous that we've suggested one of your players may possibly deserve a ban. Kind of hints at some deep rooted insecurity. Possibly because you are a one man team at the moment, who knows?'"
A
little thought was all it needed to see your post for the garbage it was; so thank you for your advice, but all the thinking needed was done before replying. It wasn't a bad challenge, merely a bad outcome. The two aren't one and the same. It was never a 1-2 sort of offence. Would you like to know how I can say that? Because it was ajudged no further case to answer. QED. I have no problem with you suggesting one of our players deserved a ban; I said the same myself re: Dudson on Monday. What I DO object to, however, is the absolute nonsense you posted. Basically you tried to make out there was a deliberate attempt to injure on O'Loughlin's part and that the Wigan players revelled in that injury. Neither was true. What's more, I have no doubts whatsoever that you even believed that in the first place. I'm equally sure that, should you get the opportunity to ask any of your own players what they think of O'Loughlin, they would have nothing but the highest praise for him both as a player and a person. In fact run your theory of his deliberate attempt to injure Richards by one of them, should you get the chance, and see what reaction you get! As I said earlier, the simple fact is you made some rubbish up and posted it as fact. Well, I guess that's your prerogative. These are free boards after all. However, don't be surprised when you are brought to task over it. That's my prerogative. By the way, the amateur psychology at the end of your last post is equally as laughable as your original assertions. You do have a vivid (if somewhat ludicrous) imagination there, don't you?
