Quote Th'ump="Th'ump"The only two wi*an players that I'd take for our first team would be Green & SOL. You'll obviously disagree because, in our own way, we're both biased. But that is my genuine belief.
The difference today (and in several other clashes between us in recent years) was the level of aggression, intensity & passion displayed by the wi*an players - and the fact that the semi-shaven ape made changes at halftime to improve your tactics, whilst Brown presumably played with his todger.'"
With all due respect you don't consistently beat a team by only having 2 better players and 15 worse ones...no matter how good the coach or tactics! There's bias and there's blindness. May I respectfully suggest you're suffering from the latter. If you seriously think Scott Taylor, Josh Charnley (Current England international and the league's top try scorer btw), Liam Farrell or Bateman for example wouldn't make your team you're seriously deluded! I also think, as good as Lomax is, you'd definitely accommodate a genuine world class talent like Bowen. He's been among the top 5 NRL fullbacks for over a decade now and, contrary to the obvious wishes your side of the hill, he's now showing that he has brought enough of that form over to be a sensation in Superleague. You've already mentioned O'Loughlin and Green and I very much doubt you would turn your noses up at Burgess if he became available too!
As a Wigan fan I could also add that Flower, Pettybourne and Crosby would walk into your team ahead of the pudding that is LMS but I accept that you may feel differently.
What I will say, however, is that you seriously need to stop believing the ridiculous comments being made about 'being better on paper' and take a leaf out of your coaches book and recognise the truth. If you were genuinely better you would regularly beat us. You don't. That, quite frankly, settles the argument.
