1. When a players gets banned after being put on report against say Wigan, make them serve their final game ban at Wigan. This frustrates fans who think that referees are taking the easy option (which they are on some occasions).
2. Make referees have to retake their refereeing badge every 5 years, and also get their eyes tested every year (no joke, many refs are in their 40s and eyesight can deteriorate).
3. Attempt to take a video referee to every match, as this will increase investment into the sport and be a statement of intent that the RFL want the sport to advance.

There are others, but I suspect you know a few yourself.

Petitions the last resort of a lost cause.

If there isn't enough referees then we train others to a high standard and let them work up the divisions. Being a video referee is probably easier than being a referee on the pitch, because you can watch things repeatedly, from different views and in slow motion. I would not be fit to referee a Super League game, yet I'd probably do a good job with the luxury of all the things above.
Which also brings me to number 4.

4. Train up younger referees through the division, more referees than are currently being trained anyways.

5. Ensure more communication between the players and the disciplinary when handing out bans.
For example the three Widnes players dangerous tackle/throw on Richard Whiting. They escaped a ban because they didn't know who was the culprit. So you tell them "Whoever lifted the legs up admit it now. Otherwise you all get a ban."
This is a very childish way of looking at things, but it is also relevant.

6. Three penalties and you get a sin bin. This isn't applied enough if at all. By penalties I don't mean forward passes, I mean foul play like holding down, high tackles, shoulder charges etc. Things which are either intentional to put the other team at a disadvantage and or dangerous.m

Again, you've never been involved in a refereeing society before have you? Since you claim to have given up the game, you should have some free time, I'd recommend you go down there, and learn about the structure of refereeing. Don't get me wrong there are plenty of issues with the current system (internal politics being the major one, but that's true of barba vs rfl too) - but you don't seem to currently have any idea how referees get to super league ...



I'm not even gonna go near this. If it was so easy that the average man on the street could do it - how come the current lot of paid professionals (no matter how low quality you consider them to be) keep making mistakes?



... I feel like I've already covered this point ... So I'll put it another way

So what your saying is, let clubs nominate which player gets banned? Right, cos that can work...



What about offside? Often there is more than one person to choose from when a penalty is given - do they all get a strike? Does the ref choose 1 person to get a strike? Also, as I'm sure you'll be keen to point out, some refs can't count to 6 properly, so how are they supposed to remember which player(s) is on strike 2? Take the saints game vs Wakefield last week - the Wakefield fans were apocalyptic after the game given the penalties the ref gave in the second half - imagine if those penalties had also led to a sinbinning - we'd of had the start of ww3! Further, we have the option for the ref to instigate a "whole team warning" which led to several sin bins last year - it works okay to well as a system - by drawing hard set lines in the sand, will just cause chaos

I still reckon we should GPS tag all the players and the ball and watch the fans kick off as a penalty is given every play the ball.

Discretion allows the game to flow.

Setting hard and fast rules for a computer to announce rule breaches would lead to 99 penalties per half.

Total BS of a petition.