Perry said in Sponsors lounge on Friday that he could have played but they were just being cautious with another week given last season's problems.

With all due respect to Wakefield I think that was the right decision.

This is his second injury in as many years that there doesn't appear to be a specified recovery time from. That doesn't happen very often. Most players are given an estimated time for recovery. Could be some mileage in what you say.

Rush has said publically that it is no longer the policy to give estimated times of recovery and return as he thinks this puts pressure on the player and the backroom staff.

Hmm... Playing devils advocate here, that could be to take the pressure of an underperforming physio team? Its not like every other sporting outfit in the world gives estimated return times.

That's an interesting take on it and could go some way to explaining the last few seasons in which we seemed to have had more than our fair share of injuries.

How can you say that when St. Royce said that the injuries were impact injuries and had nothing to do with the clubs training regime?