Just like fosters kick to the head on whitehead

Quite simple really why you haven't: he doesn't deserve a ban for it.

Elima on the other hand does.

let me get this right, being abit care less and pulling out of fully kicking a fellow player in the head is NOT the same as lineing up a player and smashing them late and making contact with their head with your elbow

Yes Elima does, not denying that.

Foster has not been charged with any offence, he was cleared of any wrong doing
The Ref got it wrong by putting him on a charge and giving the penalty under the posts. You got 2pts for nothing.

You also beat a pretty crap team.

im glad wire fans are not kicking us while we are down, 'pretty crap' is a understatement

I can smell the Bull from here (across the pennines)

It was a penalty. If it happened at the 50 yard line it would be a penalty and if it happened at the in goal it is a penalty. I am struggling to see why you can't grasp that.

A player attacking the head of a payer in the act of grounding a ball (whether intentional or not) is a penalty, and, thus, an 8 point try. Simples.

Also, Although it could be argued that Bradford beat a team. It actually seems like Saints were beat by a team that was missing 12 players and hadn't won at home all season. oops!

If Whitehead had been knocked out would Foster have been off?

The circumstances may have been different, but when Raynor knocked Tomkins out in the CC it was red. He made a lot more contact, but he was going to knock the ball out (if Fosters entitled to try and kick the ball, surely Raynor was allowed to have a try at knocking it out) both missed and connected with the head.

Foster was close to the ball though, and the ball was in open play, not being carried.

Who's a Wire Fan?, But were still Crap

Foster doesn't though as he pulled out of it; he was reckless at most.