Quote: The Chair Maker "By opening the terraces at just 80% design capacity Saints should ensure that all fans can be comfortably accommodated in the terraces, rather than go for a PR disaster as at Warrington, when they sold 14200 tickets for their opening matches , only to discover that this was an unsafe level of spectator density. As a result Wire had to face the embarrassment of having capacity cut from 14200 to 13000.'"
'"
PR disaster? Embarrassment?
After the first game it just hasn't been an issue.
Quote: Dave T "By opening the terraces at just 80% design capacity Saints should ensure that all fans can be comfortably accommodated in the terraces, rather than go for a PR disaster as at Warrington, when they sold 14200 tickets for their opening matches , only to discover that this was an unsafe level of spectator density. As a result Wire had to face the embarrassment of having capacity cut from 14200 to 13000.'"
'"
PR disaster? Embarrassment?
After the first game it just hasn't been an issue.'"
It wasn't resolved after the first game. Everytime we went to the HJ it was packed on the west terrace and people were standing in the aisles. It was not a pleasant experience.
Quote: Agent Mulder "By opening the terraces at just 80% design capacity Saints should ensure that all fans can be comfortably accommodated in the terraces, rather than go for a PR disaster as at Warrington, when they sold 14200 tickets for their opening matches , only to discover that this was an unsafe level of spectator density. As a result Wire had to face the embarrassment of having capacity cut from 14200 to 13000.'"
'"
PR disaster? Embarrassment?
After the first game it just hasn't been an issue.'"
It wasn't resolved after the first game. Everytime we went to the HJ it was packed on the west terrace and people were standing in the aisles. It was not a pleasant experience.'"
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
