The increase is £389K which is an 11% increase on the previous year. Playing & Coaching Staff no's have also gone up by 10.5% (from 84 to 93) so that seems logical.
Quote: saint at wire "The increase is £389K which is an 11% increase on the previous year. Playing & Coaching Staff no's have also gone up by 10.5% (from 84 to 93) so that seems logical.
Have we noticed a 10% improvement as a result?
Quote: saint at wire "The increase is £389K which is an 11% increase on the previous year. Playing & Coaching Staff no's have also gone up by 10.5% (from 84 to 93) so that seems logical.
9 new (presumably non-playing) roles at an average wage of around £40k seems unduly extravagant to me.
Regarding the earlier post about Scully and KC, no way should they be on anything like their playing wages. No other club would pay £100k plus on an assistant conditioner, so why would we?
Quote: Dux "9 new (presumably non-playing) roles at an average wage of around £40k seems unduly extravagant to me.
Regarding the earlier post about Scully and KC, no way should they be on anything like their playing wages. No other club would pay £100k plus on an assistant conditioner, so why would we?'"
...not that I would accuse our fine club of doing anything similar.
Quote: Dux "9 new (presumably non-playing) roles at an average wage of around £40k seems unduly extravagant to me.
Regarding the earlier post about Scully and KC, no way should they be on anything like their playing wages. No other club would pay £100k plus on an assistant conditioner, so why would we?'"
1649_1338292262.jpgI have followed the LONDON CLUB since I was in my teensl even though born in St Helens and still live nearby and went to the first game at Fulham, also Big West Ham Supporter:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_1649.jpg
I keep saying it but since we received the Sky monies the game has gone crazy and spends money as if it is going out of style, okay nothing like football.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
