3076_1671446335.jpgSAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy
For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row
Saints have five in a row:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3076.jpg
2595.jpgI'm not Jesus Christ, I've come to accept that now.
[quote][b]XBrettKennyX wrote:[/b] Once more the anti SC brigade, purposely or otherwise fail to see the point.
Thick as pig swill.[/quote]:2595.jpg
47035_1386433761.gifWe can be bold enough to make a stand and do battle for our views and beliefs. But we must strive to be mature enough not to resort to unnecessary personal attacks upon people with opposing views.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_47035.gif
Jes, I expect 100's of players to be infront of the panel next week and all SL games abandoned the following week.
Basically the verdict is saying that even in a tackle of less time than it takes me to decide between coke and pepsi a player must account for the attacking players movements, other players in the tackle and their own body movements.
Stupid decision. All this from a standing tackle, so all those player who hit the deck and get turned can complain that they are being manipulated without much arguement.
Jes, I expect 100's of players to be infront of the panel next week and all SL games abandoned the following week.
Basically the verdict is saying that even in a tackle of less time than it takes me to decide between coke and pepsi a player must account for the attacking players movements, other players in the tackle and their own body movements.
Stupid decision. All this from a standing tackle, so all those player who hit the deck and get turned can complain that they are being manipulated without much arguement.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
