yeah a scrum half and a stand off what about our wingers [i know wheeler played there tonight but hes a stand off] centres and full back and do you really want to see five drives and a kick every week

I don't disagree with a number of the posters saying we are not as good to watch under potter as previous years but the "entertainment factor" took a back seat under Anderson too but was masked to a certain extent by success.

That we havent signed a big name since we splashed the cash on Cayless is a worry, we are bringing through young talent and although we are losing a golden age of players there was a sizeable gap between wello and roby graham stepping up but since then the conveyor belt seems in full flow.

I still cant understand the logic of a 2 year deal for Potter if we are continuing in this vein unless we have someone lined up.

But this was obviously identified last year.

As I said 1 game in and we`re spitting the dummy?

Squad wise I still think we are as good as last year if not a little quicker now. All the concern fans had last year are still there of course but if we had won tonight could we have taken much from the game played in such conditions.

Much as the pies beating the crusaders doesn't make them world beaters.

I found last night entertaining..... Thanks guys...

And as for the comments on here... Its the first game... get a grip!!!

The Conditions were the same for both sides!!! Hull managed to play well and showed flair, commitment, fitness, desire, skill.
That game was playable with or without sky!!!

Things may have changed now but it used to be that the ref had to stand on the centre spot and be able to see both goalposts and all 4 corners for the game to go ahead. We could see the goalposts at the scoreboard end from where we were standing, just not what was actually going on!