Looking at the whole body of work you'd have to say Pryce over Eastmond. But judging from recent performances it's not so clear cut.

Pryce has suffered from the same malaise that is infecting the rest of the team and his attacking edge has been blunted. But Eastmond, perhaps because he sees the chance to impress and beef up his leverage in contract talks, seem just as sharp as ever.

So of the two right now; Eastmond for me.

on current form eastmond is looking better but if you look at big picture pryce is massive in attack for us.

I'd agree. We'd probably have lost another half dozen games had it not been for Pryce when he stood up and took charge. Pity he stopped doing that!

strange thing is that pryce is not playing even close to his best but IMO has still been 1 of our better players in this rough patch.

Pryce makes good yards and does his tackling. Pryce, Kyle and roby look like only players that can make a break.

IMO Kyle, longy and pryce all need to play in starting 13 in order to win at old Trafford.

Depends what you mean by ' currently'. He has been poor of late, standing and passing and little else.

You must be joking, there are many miles better attacking players in the NRL

that's why I wrote ONE of the best in the world.

Well, this is true.

I used to take this view, but I'm not sure it's true.

Some of the games where Pryce has been accused of "hiding" on here he has put in massive defensive stints, akin to Wilkin.

Admittedly he sometimes doesn't impress as much as we know he can with ball in hand, but he doesn't hide.

I agree. Pryce gets through a lot of tackles. He still looks the player most likely to make a break.

tbh I think when saints are in top gear pryce brings alot to the party. When they fail to get on top and dominate you don't notice him. Kyle seems more of a live wire who can create something against the grain whatever the conditions.