Quote sgtwilko="sgtwilko"You all need to have a good nights rest, watch the game again!! And you will see that's how the game should be refed!! In the nrl thailer would be praised !! He just lets the teams get on with it where as ganson, smith and Bentham have their neb in when it's not needed!! When you get thailer the teams decide the result not the officials!! he's the best ref in sl by a mile!! But those of you who Want the ref to give you field position instead of a good kicking game will disagree'"
I couldn't disagree more. If I watch some early summer rugby from 1996-2000 I see fast flowing rugby and a fair few penalties awarded because holding down is the same offence now as it was then. The difference is that most sides are so quick and skilled at getting up, facing forward and playing the ball that defences can't cope. The result is that referees are simply allowing the PTB to be slowed down to ridiculous levels so the defences can reset and get back the 10.
The reality is that a fit fast side is now being punished as a lesser side can take the michael and most of the time get away with it.
I say penalise where you need to regardless of the penalty count. It's not a referee's job to make a game flow or turn a blind eye or comply with RFL refereeing directives. He is meant to be there to officiate fairly and if he allows the rules to be broken at nearly every tackle by holding down then he is not doing his job. What he is doing is ruining the spectacle of fast open rugby and levelling the gap between two teams in terms of skill and fitness.
I'd rather see a match with a total penalty count of 30 with 12 tries scored than a game with 6 penalties in total and only four tries scored.
Otherwise we are going backwards and not forwards in our development.