You never are. Some of your analysis is quite embarassing. I thought as a neutral young Tompkins played very well, far better than the credit you gave him.

How do you compare him to Eastmond?

How is he an idiot defensively when he makes more tackles, and misses less than the so-called 'best SH in SL'?
Always offside and never square.



As pointed out, your observational skills need work.

Is there something about Leeds we should know?

I don't really know, I've not seen Eastmond play much. Eastmond looks faster and more skillful with a better kicking game, but has never had the extended run in the side Tompkins has had in order to make a decision on whether he'll make it at scrum half or not. Tompkins looks a very good young player, but seems to make a lot of poor decisions at times which against better sides that Hull KR would cost Wigan. As ever with their young players he would be better served leaving ASAP so he doesn't end up on the career scrapheap with so many of their other players.

Is that guy (and his crony) for real? Seriously?

[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=417042&start=0You gotta love that bi-polar disorder[/url

One minute pube head is not fit for the shirt, next minute he would be an outstanding NRL player.

Quote RB="RB"Idiot Saddened! superleague.co.uk/statistics_pla ... eason=2009 PWNED.'" Surely for a 6 or 7 the important stats are try assists, attacking kicks, runs from dummy half and attacking kicks? Longy (who is not having his best season) is better 3 out of 4 even when more games is taken into account. Sam is a good player, and COULD become a great one, the same with myler and eastmond(or smith or wheeler or lomax). having 3 or more potential great halves can only help the british (english) game. But none of them are currently better than longy, but next year as they are more mature and longy is a year older, who knows?

Quote RB="RB"Idiot Saddened! superleague.co.uk/statistics_pla ... eason=2009 PWNED.'" Surely for a 6 or 7 the important stats are try assists, attacking kicks, runs from dummy half and attacking kicks? Longy (who is not having his best season) is better 3 out of 4 even when more games is taken into account. Sam is a good player, and COULD become a great one, the same with myler and eastmond(or smith or wheeler or lomax). having 3 or more potential great halves can only help the british (english) game. But none of them are currently better than longy, but next year as they are more mature and longy is a year older, who knows?

I love that site....last week all doom and gloom and everyone on suicide watch - they win a game and suddenly every player is awesome and they are going to win every competition.

Tell me about it. It's either 'giddy week' or they are on suicide watch. Being rubbish isn't good for their health. What makes me laugh the most is that when you assess the strengths of their side and ours as individuals, all of their players are better.

like this?

whats so funny about taking tomkins over myler every day of the week?